Skip to content

Conversation

@ronag
Copy link
Member

@ronag ronag commented Jun 22, 2024

This relates to...

Rationale

Changes

Features

Bug Fixes

Breaking Changes and Deprecations

Status

@ronag ronag requested a review from metcoder95 June 23, 2024 06:21

return await new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
if (this[kContentLength] > limit) {
if (this[kContentLength] > limit || this[kBytesRead] > limit) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shall we consider this a breaking change?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think so.

@ronag ronag merged commit 0455e06 into main Jun 23, 2024
ronag added a commit to nxtedition/undici that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
* upstream/main:
  fix: use explicit flag for when use has interacted with stream (nodejs#3361)
  refactor: simplify signal handling (nodejs#3362)
  fix: consider bytes read when dumping (nodejs#3360)
  websocket: don't use pooled buffer in mask pool (nodejs#3357)
  Revert "fix: post request signal (nodejs#3354)" (nodejs#3359)
  fix: post request signal (nodejs#3354)
  build(deps): bump node from `075a5cc` to `9af472b` in /build (nodejs#3355)
@Uzlopak Uzlopak deleted the dump-bytes-read branch August 1, 2024 09:57
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2024
This was referenced Dec 16, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Mar 12, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request May 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants