Skip to content

[v22.x backport] worker: make Worker async disposable #58455

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 28, 2025

Conversation

jasnell
Copy link
Member

@jasnell jasnell commented May 26, 2025

Backport of #58385

@jasnell jasnell requested a review from aduh95 May 26, 2025 01:04
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. v22.x Issues that can be reproduced on v22.x or PRs targeting the v22.x-staging branch. worker Issues and PRs related to Worker support. labels May 26, 2025
@jasnell jasnell changed the title worker: make Worker async disposable [Backport] worker: make Worker async disposable May 26, 2025
@juanarbol
Copy link
Member

Maybe it is quite irrelevant, but this backport diverges a bit from the original PR (one extra commit) and each commit is missing its metadata (trailing, same as the original PR).

@jasnell
Copy link
Member Author

jasnell commented May 26, 2025

This was a manual commit put together before the other one landed. Will update it with the metadata later.

@jasnell jasnell force-pushed the jasnell/backport-worker-dispose branch from 23474ab to a8ffbcd Compare May 26, 2025 01:19
Copy link
Member

@juanarbol juanarbol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was a manual commit put together before the other one landed. Will update it with the metadata later.

Oh, I see. Although, all commits needs its trailers. I think a rebase and a ncu command for each patch will fix it. I'm approving considering that you'll add the git trailers for each commit as it should be.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member Author

jasnell commented May 26, 2025

i'm not planning on back porting both of the original commits since one is only relevant for 24.x. This one commit combines the base change along the 22.x version of the test that landed in the original.

@aduh95 aduh95 changed the title [Backport] worker: make Worker async disposable [v22.x backport] worker: make Worker async disposable May 26, 2025
@aduh95 aduh95 added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jun 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jun 10, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@aduh95 aduh95 added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 21, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 21, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

jasnell added 2 commits July 28, 2025 11:07
PR-URL: nodejs#58385
Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#58455
Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Daeyeon Jeong <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs#58385
Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#58455
Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Daeyeon Jeong <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
@aduh95 aduh95 force-pushed the jasnell/backport-worker-dispose branch from 514262c to 66fccc2 Compare July 28, 2025 09:08
@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

aduh95 commented Jul 28, 2025

Landed in 6905258...66fccc2

@aduh95 aduh95 merged commit 66fccc2 into nodejs:v22.x-staging Jul 28, 2025
19 of 20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. v22.x Issues that can be reproduced on v22.x or PRs targeting the v22.x-staging branch. worker Issues and PRs related to Worker support.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants