[v18.x backport] crypto: add CryptoKey Symbol.toStringTag #46340
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Review requested:
|
nodejs-github-bot
added
crypto
panva
added a commit
to panva/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2023
closes nodejs#45987 PR-URL: nodejs#46042 Fixes: nodejs#45987 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <[email protected]> Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#46340
panva
force-pushed
the
backport-46042-to-v18.x
branch
from
14d0106 to
043d264
Compare
panva
added a commit
to panva/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2023
closes nodejs#45987 PR-URL: nodejs#46042 Fixes: nodejs#45987 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <[email protected]> Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#46340
panva
force-pushed
the
backport-46042-to-v18.x
branch
from
043d264 to
e6e9a79
Compare
github-actions
bot
removed
the
request-ci
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
|
cc @juanarbol |
12 tasks
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
|
It appears you've got this in v18.x-staging already. 👍 feel free to close as needed. |
|
I will rebase and rerun the CI for this backport! Thanks so much for backporting this! <3 |
|
It'll end up being an empty commit, you've already got the pr landed on staging (somehow ;)) |
closes nodejs#45987 PR-URL: nodejs#46042 Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#46340 Fixes: nodejs#45987 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <[email protected]>
juanarbol
force-pushed
the
backport-46042-to-v18.x
branch
from
e6e9a79 to
1a3cd21
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
A, yeah, that makes sense. I usually try land PRs even with merge conflicts; just after merge conflicts (resolved) break some tests, I request the backports to the authors. Anyway thanks for backporting this! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backports #46042 because it doesn't land cleanly without #45855 but is in itself useful to backport for the ecosystem given the longevity of the v18.x LTS release line.