Skip to content

Conversation

@SimonRastikian
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #145.
Testing is not done here and should be extensively completed in #146 .

@SimonRastikian SimonRastikian self-assigned this Oct 10, 2025
@SimonRastikian SimonRastikian added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 10, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 10, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 111 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 86.86%. Comparing base (0ceeef7) to head (b5da80a).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/benchmarking_utils/io.rs 0.00% 104 Missing ⚠️
src/test_utils.rs 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
src/participants.rs 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #147      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.93%   86.86%   -1.08%     
==========================================
  Files          41       42       +1     
  Lines        8985     9096     +111     
  Branches     8985     9096     +111     
==========================================
  Hits         7901     7901              
- Misses        639      750     +111     
  Partials      445      445              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@SimonRastikian
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closed due to the discussion. In a nutshell, the snapshot should be done in-memory instead of in files

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Benchmark] [Participant Simulation] Protocols Derandomization: Networking Layer Change

3 participants