Skip to content

Conversation

nao1215
Copy link
Owner

@nao1215 nao1215 commented Sep 4, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated README to reflect 11 total contributors in the All-Contributors badge.
    • Added Zephyr Lykos to the contributors list with avatar, profile link, and contribution type.
    • Improved contributor acknowledgment without impacting app behavior or code.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 4, 2025

Walkthrough

Adds Zephyr Lykos (MochaaP) to contributors: updates .all-contributorsrc contributors array and README.md to reflect 11 contributors and include the new entry in the All-Contributors table. No code or behavior changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
All Contributors config
./.all-contributorsrc
Appends a new contributor object (login: MochaaP / name: Zephyr Lykos) with "code" contribution; no other structural changes.
README documentation
./README.md
Increments All-Contributors badge from 10 to 11 and adds Zephyr Lykos to the contributors table with avatar and links.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

I thump my paws—another friend hops in,
Eleven carrots shining in our bin.
Zephyr’s code breezes through the glen,
README stars now brighten again.
With twitching whiskers, I approve this win! 🥕✨

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch nchika/update-contributor

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5db968b and 2c6da7d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .all-contributorsrc (1 hunks)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Unit test (linux) (windows-latest, 1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)

2-2: Badge bumped to 11 — consistent with current table.

Matches contributors count; no issues.


239-239: New contributor cell renders and links correctly.

Avatar, name, and commits link (author=mochaaP) align with config.

Comment on lines +99 to +107
},
{
"login": "mochaaP",
"name": "Zephyr Lykos",
"avatar_url": "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/21154023?v=4",
"profile": "https://mochaa.ws/?utm_source=github_user",
"contributions": [
"code"
]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

LGTM: contributor added correctly; JSON remains valid.

Entry for mochaaP (Zephyr Lykos) looks consistent with existing records and All-Contributors expectations.

Run this quick check to ensure README and config stay in sync:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
count="$(jq '.contributors | length' .all-contributorsrc)"
echo "contributors in .all-contributorsrc: $count"
badge="$(rg -nPo 'all_contributors-\K\d+' README.md | head -1)"
echo "badge count in README.md: $badge"
test "$badge" = "$count" || { echo "Mismatch between badge and contributors count"; exit 1; }
rg -n 'commits\?author=mochaaP' README.md >/dev/null || { echo "Missing mochaaP commit link in README"; exit 1; }
echo "OK"

Length of output: 438


Approve contributor addition; fix badge count extraction in verification script
JSON update is correct and mochaaP (Zephyr Lykos) is added as expected. Update the README-sync check to drop the -n flag so rg returns only the number, not line:match:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
count="$(jq '.contributors | length' .all-contributorsrc)"
echo "contributors in .all-contributorsrc: $count"
badge="$(rg -Po 'all_contributors-\K\d+' README.md | head -1)"
echo "badge count in README.md: $badge"
test "$badge" = "$count" || { echo "Mismatch between badge and contributors count"; exit 1; }
rg -q 'commits\?author=mochaaP' README.md || { echo "Missing mochaaP commit link in README"; exit 1; }
echo "OK"
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .all-contributorsrc around lines 99 to 107, the README-sync verification
script extracts the badge count with ripgrep using a flag that returns
line:match; update the command to drop the -n flag and use an output-only match
(e.g., rg -Po or rg --only-matching) and pipe to head -1 so it yields just the
numeric badge, then compare that numeric badge to the jq-derived contributors
count and keep the existing README link check for mochaaP.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2025

Code Metrics Report

main (5db968b) #198 (a7e6829) +/-
Coverage 86.2% 86.5% +0.3%
Test Execution Time 19s 5m9s +4m50s
Details
  |                     | main (5db968b) | #198 (a7e6829) |  +/-   |
  |---------------------|----------------|----------------|--------|
+ | Coverage            |          86.2% |          86.5% |  +0.3% |
  |   Files             |             14 |             14 |      0 |
  |   Lines             |            603 |            603 |      0 |
+ |   Covered           |            520 |            522 |     +2 |
- | Test Execution Time |            19s |           5m9s | +4m50s |

Code coverage of files in pull request scope (74.3% → 75.6%)

Files Coverage +/- Status
cmd/update.go 75.6% +1.3% affected

Reported by octocov

@nao1215 nao1215 merged commit aef9572 into main Sep 4, 2025
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant