Add clarification about graph database solutions

[wmwxwa]

Added a note about graph database solutions in Microsoft Fabric.

Important

Required for API changes:

• [] Link to API.md file: ADD LINK HERE
• [] Link to PR for public-facing schema changes (schema-Prod-beta/v1.0.csdl): ADD LINK HERE

---

Add other supporting information, such as a description of the PR changes:

ADD INFORMATION HERE

---

Important

The following guidance is for Microsoft employees only. Community contributors can ignore this message; our content team will manage the status.

After you've created your PR, expand this section for tips and additional instructions.

• do not merge is the default PR status and is automatically added to all open PRs that don't have the ready to merge label.
• Add the ready for content review label to start a review. Only PRs that have met the minimum requirements for content review and have this label are reviewed.
• If your content reviewer requests changes, review the feedback and address accordingly as soon as possible to keep your pull request moving forward. After you address the feedback, remove the changes requested label, add the review feedback addressed label, and select the Re-request review icon next to the content reviewer's alias. If you can't add labels, add a comment with #feedback-addressed to the pull request.
• After the content review is complete, your reviewer will add the content review complete label. When the updates in this PR are ready for external customers to use, replace the do not merge label with ready to merge and the PR will be merged within 24 working hours.
• Pull requests that are inactive for more than 6 weeks will be automatically closed. Before that, you receive reminders at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks. If you still need the PR, you can reopen or recreate the request.

For more information, see the Content review process summary.

[learn-build-service-prod]

Learn Build status updates of commit 6562214:

⚠️ Validation status: warnings

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
concepts/overview.md	⚠️Warning		Details

concepts/overview.md

• Line 41, Column 1: [Warning: code-block-indented - See documentation] Indented code blocks aren't allowed. Use a Markdown code block surrounded by triple backticks (```).

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Note: Your PR may contain errors or warnings or suggestions unrelated to the files you changed. This happens when external dependencies like GitHub alias, Microsoft alias, cross repo links are updated. Please use these instructions to resolve them.

[wmwxwa]

@Danielabom please assist with moving this PR forward

[learn-build-service-prod]

Learn Build status updates of commit 6562214:

⚠️ Validation status: warnings

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
concepts/overview.md	⚠️Warning		Details

concepts/overview.md

• Line 41, Column 1: [Warning: code-block-indented - See documentation] Indented code blocks aren't allowed. Use a Markdown code block surrounded by triple backticks (```).

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Note: Your PR may contain errors or warnings or suggestions unrelated to the files you changed. This happens when external dependencies like GitHub alias, Microsoft alias, cross repo links are updated. Please use these instructions to resolve them.

[FaithOmbongi]

Hi @wmwxwa - From my cursory review of the graph database content, graph database doesn't seem to have any correlation with Microsoft Graph. Might I be wrong?

[wmwxwa]

This doc shows up in Google search results for graph database. Moreover, some people who are unfamiliar with have Microsoft Graph have asked if it's a graph database product. Hence the reason to clarify it. Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>

…

________________________________ From: Faith Moraa Ombongi ***@***.***> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:33:27 PM To: microsoftgraph/microsoft-graph-docs-contrib ***@***.***> Cc: Will Wang[wawng] ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [microsoftgraph/microsoft-graph-docs-contrib] Add clarification about graph database solutions (PR #9686) [https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/14026935?s=20&v=4]FaithOmbongi left a comment (microsoftgraph/microsoft-graph-docs-contrib#9686)<#9686 (comment)> Hi @wmwxwa<https://github.com/wmwxwa> - From my cursory review of the graph database content, graph database doesn't seem to have any correlation with Microsoft Graph. Might I be wrong? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#9686 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZVWN7PT5GOEQMKEV67ONND3XSKLPAVCNFSM6AAAAACI6FZSFWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTIMBQGMYTAOBZGI>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[FaithOmbongi]

This doc shows up in Google search results for graph database. Moreover, some people who are unfamiliar with have Microsoft Graph have asked if it's a graph database product. Hence the reason to clarify it. Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Get Outlook for Androidhttps://aka.ms/AAb9ysg
…
________________________________ From: Faith Moraa Ombongi @.> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2025 8:33:27 PM To: microsoftgraph/microsoft-graph-docs-contrib @.> Cc: Will Wang[wawng] @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [microsoftgraph/microsoft-graph-docs-contrib] Add clarification about graph database solutions (PR #9686) [https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/14026935?s=20&v=4]FaithOmbongi left a comment (microsoftgraph/microsoft-graph-docs-contrib#9686)<#9686 (comment)> Hi @wmwxwahttps://github.com/wmwxwa - From my cursory review of the graph database content, graph database doesn't seem to have any correlation with Microsoft Graph. Might I be wrong? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#9686 (comment)>, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZVWN7PT5GOEQMKEV67ONND3XSKLPAVCNFSM6AAAAACI6FZSFWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTIMBQGMYTAOBZGI. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

Hmm, then I think we should consider how to improve SEO of graph database content set instead. Please reach out to the Microsoft Learn SEO team if there's any guidance they can provide. I'll also consult internally on alternatives.

[wmwxwa]

SEO is already in the works; it takes months to take effect. In the meantime, could you please help with this PR and support our product, which was just launched last week? @FaithOmbongi

[FaithOmbongi]

SEO is already in the works; it takes months to take effect. In the meantime, could you please help with this PR and support our product, which was just launched last week? @FaithOmbongi

Hi @wmwxwa - I appreciate the additional context and sympathize with the potential confusion. I’ve consulted with the Microsoft Graph team, and we feel that adding this note—particularly on the Graph Overview page—may introduce confusion by diverting focus from the core subject. It's also why we don't have a similar note to/from the SQL graph database content either. Please bear with us.