[cadons-ctus] New port

[Cadons]

No description provided.

[Cadons]

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree

[Cadons]

• Changes comply with the maintainer guide.
• The name of the port matches an existing name for this component on https://repology.org/ if possible, and/or is strongly associated with that component on search engines.
• Optional dependencies are resolved in exactly one way. For example, if the component is built with CMake, all find_package calls are REQUIRED, are satisfied by vcpkg.json's declared dependencies, or disabled with CMAKE_DISABLE_FIND_PACKAGE_Xxx.
• The versioning scheme in vcpkg.json matches what upstream says.
• The license declaration in vcpkg.json matches what upstream says.
• The installed as the "copyright" file matches what upstream says.
• The source code of the component installed comes from an authoritative source.
• The generated "usage text" is accurate. See adding-usage for context.
• The version database is fixed by rerunning ./vcpkg x-add-version --all and committing the result.
• Only one version is in the new port's versions file.
• Only one version is added to each modified port's versions file.

[BillyONeal]

[x] The name of the port matches an existing name for this component on https://repology.org/ if possible, and/or is strongly associated with that component on search engines.

This does not appear to be true as far as I can tell? repology does not have the name and casual searching points to several libraries all claiming to be a 'tusclient' but none of which are "Cadons/tusclient". I think the name of the port needs to become cadons-tusclient. See also https://learn.microsoft.com/vcpkg/contributing/maintainer-guide#check-names-against-other-repositories

Note that this is only about the name of the port. The name used

[x] The license declaration in vcpkg.json matches what upstream says.

https://github.com/Cadons/libtusclient/blob/main/lib/tusclient/LICENSE does not say MIT. Since you are upstream, can you delete this file if you actually hold copyright on the repo contents and your intent is to ship MIT?

The linux builds failed due to:

Change Dir: '/mnt/vcpkg-ci/b/tusclient/x64-linux-dbg'

Run Build Command(s): /vcpkg/downloads/tools/ninja/1.12.1-linux/ninja -v -v -j33 install
[1/14] /usr/bin/c++ -DBOOST_CONTAINER_NO_LIB -DBOOST_CONTAINER_STATIC_LINK -DCURL_STATICLIB -DGFLAGS_IS_A_DLL=0 -DGLOG_USE_GFLAGS -DGLOG_USE_GLOG_EXPORT -I/mnt/vcpkg-ci/b/tusclient/src/1.0.0-a125a16405.clean/lib/tusclient/include/tusclient -isystem /mnt/vcpkg-ci/installed/x64-linux/include -fPIC -g -std=c++20 -MD -MT lib/tusclient/CMakeFiles/tusclient.dir/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp.o -MF lib/tusclient/CMakeFiles/tusclient.dir/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp.o.d -o lib/tusclient/CMakeFiles/tusclient.dir/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp.o -c /mnt/vcpkg-ci/b/tusclient/src/1.0.0-a125a16405.clean/lib/tusclient/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp
FAILED: lib/tusclient/CMakeFiles/tusclient.dir/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp.o 
/usr/bin/c++ -DBOOST_CONTAINER_NO_LIB -DBOOST_CONTAINER_STATIC_LINK -DCURL_STATICLIB -DGFLAGS_IS_A_DLL=0 -DGLOG_USE_GFLAGS -DGLOG_USE_GLOG_EXPORT -I/mnt/vcpkg-ci/b/tusclient/src/1.0.0-a125a16405.clean/lib/tusclient/include/tusclient -isystem /mnt/vcpkg-ci/installed/x64-linux/include -fPIC -g -std=c++20 -MD -MT lib/tusclient/CMakeFiles/tusclient.dir/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp.o -MF lib/tusclient/CMakeFiles/tusclient.dir/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp.o.d -o lib/tusclient/CMakeFiles/tusclient.dir/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp.o -c /mnt/vcpkg-ci/b/tusclient/src/1.0.0-a125a16405.clean/lib/tusclient/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp
/mnt/vcpkg-ci/b/tusclient/src/1.0.0-a125a16405.clean/lib/tusclient/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp:16:10: fatal error: format: No such file or directory
   16 | #include <format>
      |          ^~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.

... which may be fixed by asking for a later C++ standard version but I'm not positive if the Ubuntu we use for testing has that yet. If that's the case and you otherwise expect this to build for Linux please add entries to scripts/ci.baseline.txt and/or ci.feature.baseline.txt to skip this port on Linux.

[Cadons]

[x] The name of the port matches an existing name for this component on https://repology.org/ if possible, and/or is strongly associated with that component on search engines.

This does not appear to be true as far as I can tell? repology does not have the name and casual searching points to several libraries all claiming to be a 'tusclient' but none of which are "Cadons/tusclient". I think the name of the port needs to become cadons-tusclient. See also https://learn.microsoft.com/vcpkg/contributing/maintainer-guide#check-names-against-other-repositories

Note that this is only about the name of the port. The name used

[x] The license declaration in vcpkg.json matches what upstream says.

https://github.com/Cadons/libtusclient/blob/main/lib/tusclient/LICENSE does not say MIT. Since you are upstream, can you delete this file if you actually hold copyright on the repo contents and your intent is to ship MIT?

The linux builds failed due to:

Change Dir: '/mnt/vcpkg-ci/b/tusclient/x64-linux-dbg'

Run Build Command(s): /vcpkg/downloads/tools/ninja/1.12.1-linux/ninja -v -v -j33 install
[1/14] /usr/bin/c++ -DBOOST_CONTAINER_NO_LIB -DBOOST_CONTAINER_STATIC_LINK -DCURL_STATICLIB -DGFLAGS_IS_A_DLL=0 -DGLOG_USE_GFLAGS -DGLOG_USE_GLOG_EXPORT -I/mnt/vcpkg-ci/b/tusclient/src/1.0.0-a125a16405.clean/lib/tusclient/include/tusclient -isystem /mnt/vcpkg-ci/installed/x64-linux/include -fPIC -g -std=c++20 -MD -MT lib/tusclient/CMakeFiles/tusclient.dir/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp.o -MF lib/tusclient/CMakeFiles/tusclient.dir/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp.o.d -o lib/tusclient/CMakeFiles/tusclient.dir/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp.o -c /mnt/vcpkg-ci/b/tusclient/src/1.0.0-a125a16405.clean/lib/tusclient/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp
FAILED: lib/tusclient/CMakeFiles/tusclient.dir/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp.o 
/usr/bin/c++ -DBOOST_CONTAINER_NO_LIB -DBOOST_CONTAINER_STATIC_LINK -DCURL_STATICLIB -DGFLAGS_IS_A_DLL=0 -DGLOG_USE_GFLAGS -DGLOG_USE_GLOG_EXPORT -I/mnt/vcpkg-ci/b/tusclient/src/1.0.0-a125a16405.clean/lib/tusclient/include/tusclient -isystem /mnt/vcpkg-ci/installed/x64-linux/include -fPIC -g -std=c++20 -MD -MT lib/tusclient/CMakeFiles/tusclient.dir/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp.o -MF lib/tusclient/CMakeFiles/tusclient.dir/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp.o.d -o lib/tusclient/CMakeFiles/tusclient.dir/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp.o -c /mnt/vcpkg-ci/b/tusclient/src/1.0.0-a125a16405.clean/lib/tusclient/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp
/mnt/vcpkg-ci/b/tusclient/src/1.0.0-a125a16405.clean/lib/tusclient/src/tusclient/chunk/FileChunker.cpp:16:10: fatal error: format: No such file or directory
   16 | #include <format>
      |          ^~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.

... which may be fixed by asking for a later C++ standard version but I'm not positive if the Ubuntu we use for testing has that yet. If that's the case and you otherwise expect this to build for Linux please add entries to scripts/ci.baseline.txt and/or ci.feature.baseline.txt to skip this port on Linux.

@BillyONeal Can you explain me better the first 2 points ( this is my first package submission)

[BillyONeal]

@BillyONeal Can you explain me better the first 2 points ( this is my first package submission)

The first point is a request to rename the directory and the name in vcpkg.json to cadons-tusclient. Our overall design goal in requiring a component to be well known by a name to give it that 'pretty name' is that we want to avoid a situation where someone can do vcpkg install something and get a library that is totally different than the one they expect. We consider adding the github organization prefix (for things hosted on GitHub) as a sufficient marker that the person who said vcpkg install org-library actually meant that one.

But you don't need to rename your CMake configs or header names or documentation or whatever to have the cadons- prefix, we just want that for what the user types into vcpkg install.

The second point is just licensing. You're claiming that the contents are MIT but https://github.com/Cadons/libtusclient/blob/main/lib/tusclient/LICENSE is a EULA which is not MIT. It's not clear that it is safe to mark "license": "MIT" when the sources contain a different license.

[BillyONeal]

/azp run

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[dg0yt]

Some suggestions are the same as last time...

[BillyONeal]

I changed this to draft because there are outstanding build failures for a long time; please fix those and mark 'Ready for review' when you're ready for us to take another look.

[BillyONeal]

Thanks!