Added support to Ecowitt WH46 (device 262) #3010
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Seems really good. Change all tabs to (4) spaces please :) |
|
I was not aware of the style rules. Sorry, Tabs and trailing removed. |
|
FYI: README.md has been updated accordingly |
|
Nice! Thank you for considering my piece of work. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have bought a Ecowitt WH46: https://www.ecowitt.com/shop/goodsDetail/296
I see that is not initially supported in RTL_433 but WH45 is: #2099, #2101
I have reused this line:
rtl_433 -c 0 -R 0 -X "n=DP250,m=FSK_PCM,s=56,l=56,r=1500,preamble=0x2dd4"
to get some samples of the data extracted and comparing with the WH45 it seems very similar, so I created a new device and tried the compiled application for a day. It seems to work just fine.
I hope you are willing to incorporate support to this sensor based on my implementation.
Thanks