Skip to content

Conversation

@dmendelowitz
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Added section to README informing users that byte order markers are handled for UTF-8 and UTF-16 but may cause issues in other encodings and how they can check for BOMs in their CSVs

Testing guidance

Read the new section of the README and make sure it is all correct and that I didn't leave anything out

Copy link
Contributor

@julianxcarter julianxcarter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The here text looks good! I just had two minor comments.

@julianxcarter julianxcarter self-assigned this Apr 26, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@julianxcarter julianxcarter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, thanks for handling that!

Copy link
Contributor

@jafeltra jafeltra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just had one really small comment. Let me know what you think.

@jafeltra jafeltra self-assigned this Apr 26, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@jafeltra jafeltra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!

@jafeltra
Copy link
Contributor

I think this might just need to be rebased again. I doubt there are any conflicts but I just want to make sure no README updates get lost!

@dmendelowitz dmendelowitz force-pushed the readme-bom-troubleshooting branch from b83e2ed to c6e8208 Compare April 27, 2021 14:28
@jafeltra jafeltra merged commit 13c2e1a into develop Apr 27, 2021
@jafeltra jafeltra deleted the readme-bom-troubleshooting branch April 27, 2021 14:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants