This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Fix additional type hints #9543
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1fa08f4
Add a proper return type to run_in_background.
clokep 3ca2ea3
Ignore an unknown attribute.
clokep f901773
Header access.
clokep 76f9ebe
Minor changes to tests.
clokep 16bfe75
Fix calls to logger.error.
clokep 2b22d4c
Add type hints to the _log method.
clokep 2325c73
Newsfragment
clokep 16ebad3
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/develop' into clokep/twisted-typ…
clokep 6d913a0
Wrap non-Deferreds in defer.succeed.
clokep File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this isn't 100% true actually since if the result is not a
Deferred
than we return it raw, which seems confusing. I think we should likely wrap that indefer.succeed
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, probably. I don't think we should lie about our return value here.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wrapped the raw return value in
defer.succeed
, I suspect it doesn't really make sense to callrun_in_background
with a sync function, but 🤷 This would have also broke when usingawait
, so maybe we should make this an error instead?