fix: Properly pass children ids in torin benchmarks

[marc2332]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (601e7e6) 52.62% compared to head (1ead9af) 52.62%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #316   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   52.62%   52.62%           
=======================================
  Files         129      129           
  Lines       11216    11216           
=======================================
  Hits         5902     5902           
  Misses       5314     5314           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark for 929b9ba

Click to view benchmark

Test	Base	PR	%
benchmarks/big trees (deep + cached) + invalidated node in the bottom	372.1±4.06ns	110.3±0.24µs	+29542.57%
benchmarks/big trees (deep + cached) + invalidated node in the middle	381.6±3.37ns	110.4±0.23µs	+28830.82%
benchmarks/big trees (deep + cached) + invalidated node in the top	98.4±0.19µs	207.8±0.37µs	+111.18%
benchmarks/big trees (deep) nodes=10000, depth=14	118.2±0.18µs	131.8±0.19µs	+11.51%
benchmarks/big trees (deep) nodes=100000, depth=17	1236.8±15.97µs	1266.4±19.83µs	+2.39%
benchmarks/big trees (deep) nodes=4000, depth=12	56.3±0.57µs	69.7±0.71µs	+23.80%
benchmarks/big trees (wide) nodes=1000, depth=1	167.0±0.41µs	163.9±0.60µs	-1.86%
benchmarks/big trees (wide) nodes=10000, depth=1	1996.4±27.90µs	1903.1±8.00µs	-4.67%
benchmarks/big trees (wide) nodes=100000, depth=1	35.8±0.36ms	34.7±0.41ms	-3.07%

[github-actions]

Benchmark for 955764f

Click to view benchmark

Test	Base	PR	%
benchmarks/big trees (deep + cached) + invalidated node in the bottom	393.6±45.05ns	105.7±8.23µs	+26754.67%
benchmarks/big trees (deep + cached) + invalidated node in the middle	398.3±42.56ns	106.8±9.32µs	+26713.96%
benchmarks/big trees (deep + cached) + invalidated node in the top	109.5±9.40µs	209.0±17.35µs	+90.87%
benchmarks/big trees (deep) nodes=10000, depth=14	156.3±10.43µs	170.8±14.67µs	+9.28%
benchmarks/big trees (deep) nodes=100000, depth=17	1474.3±122.30µs	1386.0±128.88µs	-5.99%
benchmarks/big trees (deep) nodes=4000, depth=12	66.5±5.66µs	85.4±7.62µs	+28.42%
benchmarks/big trees (wide) nodes=1000, depth=1	208.9±21.24µs	215.4±24.64µs	+3.11%
benchmarks/big trees (wide) nodes=10000, depth=1	2.2±0.19ms	2.1±0.18ms	-4.55%
benchmarks/big trees (wide) nodes=100000, depth=1	40.2±2.64ms	39.7±2.85ms	-1.24%