Extend syzkaller coverage

[borkmann]

As a project it would be great to review and extend syzkaller coverage (external contractor?) for the networking-related syscall and netlink UAPIs.

[wdebruij]

Do you have a concrete proposal, Daniel? Targeting specific syscalls that lack coverage? You mention netlink, for instance.

A one time contract to fix up a large surface area that lacks coverage, or on-going support (which I don't know how we would fund that).

The syzkaller syscall definitions (https://github.com/google/syzkaller/tree/master/sys/linux) do get updated. We could also ask of new feature developers that expand the ABI to expand syzkaller, as part of the normal netdev review process.

[jmberg]

We can ask, but since Google requires a CLA [1], we certainly can't demand and to me even asking is borderline.

[1] https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/docs/contributing.md