-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
Debug magma on crusher #244
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ EOF | |||
echo "CC Path to C compiler (default is ${CC})" | |||
echo "CXX Path to C++ compiler (default is ${CXX})" | |||
echo "FC Path to Fortran compiler (default is ${FC})" | |||
echo "BML_ROCSPARSE Build with rocSPARSE (default is ${BML_ROCSPARSE})" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do you remove this line? The variable BML_ROCSPARSE
is still being used.
64ff5ea
to
48c9a7c
Compare
Thanks for catching that. It's not needed any more with the BML package revision. I changed CMakelists.txt and removed other refs to BML_ROCSPARSE in build.sh.
________________________________
From: Nicolas Bock ***@***.***>
Sent: Monday, February 6, 2023 8:40:46 PM
To: lanl/qmd-progress
Cc: Wall, Michael E; Author
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [lanl/qmd-progress] Debug magma on crusher (PR #244)
@nicolasbock requested changes on this pull request.
________________________________
In build.sh<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/lanl/qmd-progress/pull/244*discussion_r1098141880__;Iw!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!GreLoMHHsVkwIcvpco7_fIFJAgJBpHYRw2ODkVLiLLTFT834Owq6V8GhroEyQXznYG2Uf5pfWOoZUaRrPOo4jWrj$>:
@@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ EOF
echo "CC Path to C compiler (default is ${CC})"
echo "CXX Path to C++ compiler (default is ${CXX})"
echo "FC Path to Fortran compiler (default is ${FC})"
- echo "BML_ROCSPARSE Build with rocSPARSE (default is ${BML_ROCSPARSE})"
Why do you remove this line? The variable BML_ROCSPARSE is still being used.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/lanl/qmd-progress/pull/244*pullrequestreview-1286337475__;Iw!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!GreLoMHHsVkwIcvpco7_fIFJAgJBpHYRw2ODkVLiLLTFT834Owq6V8GhroEyQXznYG2Uf5pfWOoZUaRrPHDSUBDd$>, or unsubscribe<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA67VEP2UJZPN5DIKE34WFLWWG735ANCNFSM6AAAAAAUSXV35U__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!GreLoMHHsVkwIcvpco7_fIFJAgJBpHYRw2ODkVLiLLTFT834Owq6V8GhroEyQXznYG2Uf5pfWOoZUaRrPPSUZIXC$>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do you mean? Are we dropping off support for rocsparse?
The BML package now handles the rocSPARSE dependency. Please see the note on the commit with reference to the BML PR#...
…________________________________
From: Jean-Luc Fattebert ***@***.***>
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2023 8:19:04 AM
To: lanl/qmd-progress
Cc: Wall, Michael E; Author
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [lanl/qmd-progress] Debug magma on crusher (PR #244)
@jeanlucf22 requested changes on this pull request.
What do you mean? Are we dropping off support for rocsparse?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/lanl/qmd-progress/pull/244*pullrequestreview-1287319071__;Iw!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!Cgurs-KnpHTWOaT5-D7YvWAtXwu34CRZa2eS8tJnA7lf5Z1URilttfFzwve7xTmx2d-Da1tzhKaxiYZ1n5aH_Ky2$>, or unsubscribe<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA67VEJVLBBZFEDGXZXOMITWWJRWRANCNFSM6AAAAAAUSXV35U__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!Cgurs-KnpHTWOaT5-D7YvWAtXwu34CRZa2eS8tJnA7lf5Z1URilttfFzwve7xTmx2d-Da1tzhKaxiYZ1nz0yrX6s$>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
… ________________________________
From: Wall, Michael E
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2023 8:24:57 AM
To: lanl/qmd-progress; lanl/qmd-progress
Cc: Author
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [lanl/qmd-progress] Debug magma on crusher (PR #244)
The BML package now handles the rocSPARSE dependency. Please see the note on the commit with reference to the BML PR#...
________________________________
From: Jean-Luc Fattebert ***@***.***>
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2023 8:19:04 AM
To: lanl/qmd-progress
Cc: Wall, Michael E; Author
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [lanl/qmd-progress] Debug magma on crusher (PR #244)
@jeanlucf22 requested changes on this pull request.
What do you mean? Are we dropping off support for rocsparse?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/lanl/qmd-progress/pull/244*pullrequestreview-1287319071__;Iw!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!Cgurs-KnpHTWOaT5-D7YvWAtXwu34CRZa2eS8tJnA7lf5Z1URilttfFzwve7xTmx2d-Da1tzhKaxiYZ1n5aH_Ky2$>, or unsubscribe<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA67VEJVLBBZFEDGXZXOMITWWJRWRANCNFSM6AAAAAAUSXV35U__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!Cgurs-KnpHTWOaT5-D7YvWAtXwu34CRZa2eS8tJnA7lf5Z1URilttfFzwve7xTmx2d-Da1tzhKaxiYZ1nz0yrX6s$>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
@mewall sorry, I thought I was looking at BML. I agree, rocsparse should not be anywehere in the build scripts here |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the clarification!
Can we remove
export BML_ROCSPARSE=yes |
also then?
48c9a7c
to
f17a7d8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
CI failures are not related to the PR (there is currently a "brownout" in CI for Bionic). I will merge. |
Modifications to support cmake package bug fix for BML on OLCF crusher
This change is