Skip to content

docs: Tigris is now object storage instead of a database #31939

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Xe
Copy link

@Xe Xe commented Jul 9, 2025

Closes TIG-4616

Removes outdated examples for using Tigris and replaces them with new ones. Also see: langchain-ai/langchain-community#159

Xe added 2 commits July 8, 2025 11:16
This code dates back to when [Tigris Data][1] was a database as a service. That
product has since been sunset and the current product is globally distributed
object storage.

Removing this code as there is no possible way for it to work.

[1]: https://www.tigrisdata.com

Signed-off-by: Xe Iaso <[email protected]>
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 9, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
langchain Ready Preview 💬 Add feedback Aug 11, 2025 10:48pm

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jul 9, 2025

CodSpeed WallTime Performance Report

Merging #31939 will not alter performance

Comparing Xe:Xe/scrub-tigris-nosql-its-object-storage-now (7d50df5) with master (166c027)

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

Summary

✅ 13 untouched benchmarks

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jul 9, 2025

CodSpeed Instrumentation Performance Report

Merging #31939 will not alter performance

Comparing Xe:Xe/scrub-tigris-nosql-its-object-storage-now (7d50df5) with master (166c027)

Summary

✅ 14 untouched benchmarks

@mdrxy mdrxy added the new-integration Adding a new partner library package label Jul 22, 2025
@mdrxy
Copy link
Collaborator

mdrxy commented Aug 11, 2025

@Xe please resolve failures in CI 🙏

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
new-integration Adding a new partner library package
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants