Update django-tenants dependency to v3.8.0 #262
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
atodorov
force-pushed
the
update_django_tenants
branch
2 times, most recently
from
38490b1 to
dca645a
Compare
atodorov
force-pushed
the
update_django_tenants
branch
from
dca645a to
7810733
Compare
atodorov
force-pushed
the
update_django_tenants
branch
5 times, most recently
from
f2da770 to
3a6f4ba
Compare
atodorov
force-pushed
the
update_django_tenants
branch
2 times, most recently
from
4b5262b to
85fd639
Compare
which reverts the updates to the clone_schema() function made in django-tenants v3.8.0! This version is compatible with Django 5.2 and in theory we should be able to use DB connection pools!
atodorov
force-pushed
the
update_django_tenants
branch
from
85fd639 to
91be4e8
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
which is compatible with Django 5.2 and in theory we should be able to use DB connection pools