Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 25, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
rich >=14.0.0, <14.1.0 -> >=14.1.0, <14.2.0 age confidence

Release Notes

Textualize/rich (rich)

v14.1.0

Compare Source

Changed
Fixed
Added

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot added the packaging Updates to packaging (dependencies, etc) label Jul 25, 2025
@renovate renovate bot requested review from micahellison and wren July 25, 2025 12:11
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/rich-14.x branch from 633a7e3 to 4e6d038 Compare July 29, 2025 01:51
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/rich-14.x branch from 4e6d038 to 7732971 Compare July 29, 2025 01:52
@wren wren merged commit b89faa9 into develop Jul 29, 2025
14 checks passed
@wren wren deleted the renovate/rich-14.x branch July 29, 2025 01:59
@musicinmybrain
Copy link
Contributor

Does rich need to be pinned to a particular minor version like this, or can we at least widen it to ">=14.1, <15.0"?

@wren
Copy link
Member

wren commented Aug 2, 2025

Does rich need to be pinned to a particular minor version like this, or can we at least widen it to ">=14.1, <15.0"?

Good question! Their changelog does say that they follow semver, so I don't see a problem with only pinning the major version.

@micahellison Do you remember if we had an issue with a minor version update on this library?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

packaging Updates to packaging (dependencies, etc)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants