Package name is missing after generating complex objects including "javaType"

[manksih]

It seems that this plugin does not include the package generated sources for a schema including javaTypes.

If the following schema is given:

{ 
  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-06/schema#",
  "$id": "urn:OCPP:Cp:2:2018:4:BootNotificationRequest",
  "comment": "OCPP 2.0 - v1p0",
  "definitionnames": {
    "BootReasonEnumType": {
      "type": "string",
      "additionalProperties": true,
      "enum": [
        "ApplicationReset",
        "FirmwareUpdate",
        "LocalReset",
        "PowerUp",
        "RemoteReset",
        "ScheduledReset",
        "Triggered",
        "Unknown",
        "Watchdog"
      ]
    },
    "ChargingStationType": {
      "javaType": "ChargingStation",
      "type": "object",
      "additionalProperties": true,
      "properties": {
        "serialNumber": {
          "type": "string",
          "maxLength": 20
        },
        "model": {
          "type": "string",
          "maxLength": 20
        },
        "modem": {
          "$ref": "#/definitions/ModemType"
        },
        "vendorName": {
          "type": "string",
          "maxLength": 50
        },
        "firmwareVersion": {
          "type": "string",
          "maxLength": 50
        }
      },
      "required": [
        "model",
        "vendorName"
      ]
    },
    "ModemType": {
      "javaType": "Modem",
      "type": "object",
      "additionalProperties": true,
      "properties": {
        "iccid": {
          "type": "string",
          "maxLength": 20
        },
        "imsi": {
          "type": "string",
          "maxLength": 20
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "type": "object",
  "additionalProperties": true,
  "properties": {
    "chargingStation": {
      "$ref": "#/definitions/ChargingStationType"
    },
    "reason": {
      "$ref": "#/definitions/BootReasonEnumType"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "reason",
    "chargingStation"
  ]
}

jsonschema2pojo generates these classes:

package org.openchargealliance.ocpp20;
  ... (the rest of the imports)
@JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
@JsonPropertyOrder({
    "chargingStation",
    "reason"
})

public class BootNotificationRequest implements Serializable
{

    /**
     * 
     * (Required)
     * 
     */
    @JsonProperty("chargingStation")
    @NotNull
    private ChargingStation chargingStation;
    ...

and

import java.io.Serializable;
  ... (the rest of the imports)

@JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
@JsonPropertyOrder({
    "serialNumber",
    "model",
    "modem",
    "vendorName",
    "firmwareVersion"
})
public class ChargingStation implements Serializable
{

In this case the ChargingStation.java class does not contain the package declaration.
There is a workaround to pass the packae name to the nested objects by changing the javaType to:
javaType: "${package.path.Class}" ( which is absolutly not recommended and dirty)

But still then the import statements for the nested classes are missing.

[joelittlejohn]

The javaType represents a fully qualified name. If you don't include a package name, then you are targetting the default package.

Since this is not particularly useful, PR #1054 was merged recently and will be released as part of 1.0.2.

[adligo]

+1