Skip to content

🧹 chore: Simplify generic function calls #3578

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 16, 2025
Merged

Conversation

axrav
Copy link
Contributor

@axrav axrav commented Jul 14, 2025

Description

Used switch tags instead of if loops, simplified state management in context and tests
Fixes # (issue)

Changes introduced

List the new features or adjustments introduced in this pull request. Provide details on benchmarks, documentation updates, changelog entries, and if applicable, the migration guide.

  • Benchmarks: Performance improvement expected due to switch statement optimization over if-else chains. Switch statements are generally more efficient for multiple condition checks.
  • Documentation Update: No documentation changes required as this is an internal optimization without API changes.
  • Changelog/What's New: Code consistency improvement - replaced if-else chains with switch statements for better performance and readability.
  • Migration Guide: No migration needed as this is a non-breaking internal change.
  • API Alignment with Express: Changes maintain existing API compatibility while improving internal implementation.
  • API Longevity: Internal optimizations that don't affect public API surface, ensuring no breaking changes.
  • Examples: No new examples needed as functionality remains the same.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Enhancement (improvement to existing features and functionality)
  • Performance improvement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
  • Code consistency (non-breaking change which improves code reliability and robustness)

Checklist

Before you submit your pull request, please make sure you meet these requirements:

  • Followed the inspiration of the Express.js framework for new functionalities, making them similar in usage.
  • Conducted a self-review of the code and provided comments for complex or critical parts.
  • Updated the documentation in the /docs/ directory for [Fiber's documentation](https://docs.gofiber.io/).
  • Added or updated unit tests to validate the effectiveness of the changes or new features.
  • Ensured that new and existing unit tests pass locally with the changes.
  • Verified that any new dependencies are essential and have been agreed upon by the maintainers/community.
  • Aimed for optimal performance with minimal allocations in the new code.
  • Provided benchmarks for the new code to analyze and improve upon.

Detailed Changes

1. Switch Statement Optimization

Before:

if headerValue[j] == ':' {
    v6 = true
} else if headerValue[j] == '.' {
    v4 = true
}

After:

switch headerValue[j] {
case ':':
    v6 = true
case '.':
    v4 = true
}

2. Simplified Generic Type Usage in Tests

Before:

Locals[string](c, "john", "doe")
Locals[int](c, "age", 18)
Locals[bool](c, "isHuman", true)

After:

Locals(c, "john", "doe")
Locals(c, "age", 18)
Locals(c, "isHuman", true)

These changes improve code readability and performance by:

  • Using more efficient switch statements instead of if-else chains
  • Removing unnecessary generic type specifications where type inference works
  • Maintaining the same functionality while improving code consistency

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 14, 2025 10:53
@axrav axrav requested a review from a team as a code owner July 14, 2025 10:53
Copy link

welcome bot commented Jul 14, 2025

Thanks for opening this pull request! 🎉 Please check out our contributing guidelines. If you need help or want to chat with us, join us on Discord https://gofiber.io/discord

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 14, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes refactor conditional logic in several functions by replacing if-else statements with switch statements for clarity and consistency. Additionally, explicit generic type parameters are removed from function calls in both production and test code, relying on type inference instead. No public APIs or method signatures are altered.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
ctx.go Replaced if-else character checks with switch statements in IP extraction methods; simplified generic Query call.
ctx_test.go Removed explicit generic type parameters from Locals and Query calls in tests.
router.go Simplified route assignment logic in buildTree by merging conditions into a single if statement.
state_test.go Removed explicit generic type parameters from runGenericTest and GetStateWithDefault calls in tests and benchmarks.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant DefaultCtx
    participant HeaderParser

    Client->>DefaultCtx: extractIPsFromHeader(header)
    DefaultCtx->>HeaderParser: loop through header chars (switch on ':' or '.')
    HeaderParser-->>DefaultCtx: Return parsed IPs
    DefaultCtx-->>Client: Return list of IPs
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

v3, ⚡️ Performance

Suggested reviewers

  • sixcolors
  • efectn
  • gaby

Poem

Switches flip and cases flow,
If-else now has room to go!
Generics shed their extra weight,
Type inference feels just great.
With code so clean, a bunny hops—
Refactoring fun that never stops! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0ac49be and 9c36728.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • ctx.go (3 hunks)
  • ctx_test.go (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • ctx.go
  • ctx_test.go
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @axrav, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on internal code optimizations to enhance readability, maintainability, and performance. The primary changes involve replacing multi-condition if-else if chains with switch statements and simplifying generic function calls by leveraging Go's type inference, particularly within context and state management functionalities and their corresponding tests.

Highlights

  • Conditional Logic Refactoring: I've refactored several if-else if statements into more efficient and readable switch statements. This applies to IP address parsing logic within ctx.go and route path matching in router.go, aiming for improved performance and code clarity.
  • Generic Type Simplification: I've simplified generic function calls by removing explicit type parameters where Go's type inference can automatically determine the type. This change is primarily visible in ctx.go (for Query method calls) and various test files (ctx_test.go, state_test.go) for functions like Locals and GetState, making the code cleaner and less verbose.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR refactors various generic function calls to leverage type inference and replaces if-else chains with switch statements for improved readability and performance.

  • Swapped if-else chains for switch in context and router logic
  • Simplified generic calls by removing explicit type arguments in tests and code

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File Description
state_test.go Removed explicit generic type parameters in runGenericTest and benchmark calls
ctx_test.go Simplified calls to Locals and Query by relying on type inference
ctx.go Replaced two if-else chains in IP extraction and Query method with switch statements
router.go Replaced if/else if route matching with a switch on routePath

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
router.go (1)

642-648: Switch works, but the two cases still duplicate the same append – consider collapsing them

The new switch is clearer than the old if chain, but both case 0 and case treePath execute the very same statement.
A small refactor keeps intent while removing duplication:

- switch routePath {
- case 0:
-     tsMap[treePath] = append(tsMap[treePath], route)
- case treePath:
-     tsMap[treePath] = append(tsMap[treePath], route)
- }
+ if routePath == 0 || routePath == treePath {
+     tsMap[treePath] = append(tsMap[treePath], route)
+ }

Less code, same behavior, no extra allocations.
(If you prefer sticking with a switch, keep a single case and use fallthrough.)

state_test.go (1)

908-909: Minor: make the default value explicitly typed to avoid future surprises

0 is an untyped constant and defaults to int, which is what you want today.
If someone changes the benchmark to use uint (or any other numeric type), the call will start inferring the wrong T silently. To make intention crystal-clear:

- GetStateWithDefault(st, key, 0)
+ GetStateWithDefault[int](st, key, 0)

Not critical, just a belt-and-braces suggestion.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 87370cf and 97a6ac0.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • ctx.go (3 hunks)
  • ctx_test.go (3 hunks)
  • router.go (1 hunks)
  • state_test.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (5)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3446
File: docs/middleware/logger.md:44-44
Timestamp: 2025-05-13T00:19:16.407Z
Learning: In documentation files for the Fiber framework, code examples are often partial and don't repeat import statements that were shown in earlier examples, focusing instead on demonstrating specific usage patterns.
Learnt from: ReneWerner87
PR: gofiber/fiber#3161
File: app.go:923-932
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T07:56:21.623Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework, breaking changes are acceptable when moving from version 2 to version 3, including modifications to method signatures such as in the `Test` method in `app.go`.
router.go (2)
Learnt from: ReneWerner87
PR: gofiber/fiber#3161
File: app.go:923-932
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T07:56:21.623Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework, breaking changes are acceptable when moving from version 2 to version 3, including modifications to method signatures such as in the `Test` method in `app.go`.
Learnt from: ckoch786
PR: gofiber/fiber#3230
File: docs/whats_new.md:944-951
Timestamp: 2024-12-15T19:56:45.935Z
Learning: Detailed usage examples and explanations for new methods like `RemoveRoute` and `RemoveRouteByName` are documented in `docs/api/app.md`, so it's unnecessary to duplicate them in `docs/whats_new.md`.
state_test.go (6)
Learnt from: ReneWerner87
PR: gofiber/fiber#3161
File: app.go:923-932
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T07:56:21.623Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework, breaking changes are acceptable when moving from version 2 to version 3, including modifications to method signatures such as in the `Test` method in `app.go`.
Learnt from: efectn
PR: gofiber/fiber#3162
File: hooks_test.go:228-228
Timestamp: 2024-12-13T08:14:22.851Z
Learning: In Go test files, prefer using the `require` methods from the `testify` package for assertions instead of manual comparisons and calls to `t.Fatal` or `t.Fatalf`.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3016
File: middleware/session/store.go:164-167
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583Z
Learning: Unit tests in this project use testify require.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3016
File: middleware/session/store.go:164-167
Timestamp: 2024-10-02T23:03:31.727Z
Learning: Unit tests in this project use testify require.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#2922
File: middleware/cors/utils.go:63-71
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583Z
Learning: The project uses the testify/assert package for assertions in unit tests.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#2922
File: middleware/cors/utils.go:63-71
Timestamp: 2024-07-26T21:00:12.902Z
Learning: The project uses the testify/assert package for assertions in unit tests.
ctx_test.go (13)

undefined

<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: gaby
PR: #3193
File: middleware/cache/cache_test.go:897-897
Timestamp: 2024-11-08T04:10:42.990Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework, Context() is being renamed to RequestCtx(), and UserContext() to Context() to improve clarity and align with Go's context conventions.
</retrieved_learning>

<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: ReneWerner87
PR: #3161
File: app.go:923-932
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T07:56:21.623Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework, breaking changes are acceptable when moving from version 2 to version 3, including modifications to method signatures such as in the Test method in app.go.
</retrieved_learning>

<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: gaby
PR: #3170
File: ctx_test.go:1721-1724
Timestamp: 2024-10-16T12:12:30.506Z
Learning: In the Go unit tests in ctx_test.go, it is acceptable to use invalid CIDR notation such as "0.0.0.1/31junk" for testing purposes.
</retrieved_learning>

<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: gaby
PR: #3193
File: middleware/adaptor/adaptor.go:111-111
Timestamp: 2024-11-10T23:44:13.704Z
Learning: In the middleware/adaptor/adaptor.go file of the Fiber framework, when updating context handling, replacing c.Context() with c.RequestCtx() is appropriate to access the fasthttp.RequestCtx.
</retrieved_learning>

<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: efectn
PR: #3162
File: hooks_test.go:228-228
Timestamp: 2024-12-13T08:14:22.851Z
Learning: In Go test files, prefer using the require methods from the testify package for assertions instead of manual comparisons and calls to t.Fatal or t.Fatalf.
</retrieved_learning>

<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: efectn
PR: #3162
File: app_test.go:893-895
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T12:37:27.581Z
Learning: In the Test_App_ShutdownWithContext function in app_test.go, the clientDone channel is used to synchronize the client's request completion before proceeding, eliminating the need for additional time.Sleep calls.
</retrieved_learning>

<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: #3016
File: middleware/session/config.go:122-122
Timestamp: 2024-09-25T16:18:34.719Z
Learning: In DefaultErrorHandler(c *fiber.Ctx, err error), since c is a pointer to an interface, we need to dereference *c when calling interface methods like SendStatus.
</retrieved_learning>

<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: #3016
File: middleware/session/config.go:122-122
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583Z
Learning: In DefaultErrorHandler(c *fiber.Ctx, err error), since c is a pointer to an interface, we need to dereference *c when calling interface methods like SendStatus.
</retrieved_learning>

<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: #3016
File: middleware/session/middleware_test.go:400-407
Timestamp: 2024-09-25T17:09:03.756Z
Learning: In the Test_Session_Next function in middleware/session/middleware_test.go, the variable doNext is properly synchronized with the muNext mutex for both read and write access.
</retrieved_learning>

<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: #3016
File: middleware/session/store.go:164-167
Timestamp: 2024-10-02T23:03:31.727Z
Learning: Unit tests in this project use testify require.
</retrieved_learning>

<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: #3016
File: middleware/session/store.go:164-167
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583Z
Learning: Unit tests in this project use testify require.
</retrieved_learning>

<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: #2922
File: middleware/cors/utils.go:63-71
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583Z
Learning: The project uses the testify/assert package for assertions in unit tests.
</retrieved_learning>

<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: #2922
File: middleware/cors/utils.go:63-71
Timestamp: 2024-07-26T21:00:12.902Z
Learning: The project uses the testify/assert package for assertions in unit tests.
</retrieved_learning>

ctx.go (3)
Learnt from: gaby
PR: gofiber/fiber#3193
File: middleware/adaptor/adaptor.go:111-111
Timestamp: 2024-11-10T23:44:13.704Z
Learning: In the `middleware/adaptor/adaptor.go` file of the Fiber framework, when updating context handling, replacing `c.Context()` with `c.RequestCtx()` is appropriate to access the `fasthttp.RequestCtx`.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3016
File: middleware/csrf/csrf_test.go:188-193
Timestamp: 2024-09-25T15:57:10.221Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework tests, using `ctx.Response.Header.Cookie` may not be suitable for parsing cookies from the response header, as it requires a `*Cookie` and fills it rather than returning a string value; thus, manual parsing of the `Set-Cookie` header may be necessary.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3016
File: middleware/csrf/csrf_test.go:188-193
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework tests, using `ctx.Response.Header.Cookie` may not be suitable for parsing cookies from the response header, as it requires a `*Cookie` and fills it rather than returning a string value; thus, manual parsing of the `Set-Cookie` header may be necessary.
🔇 Additional comments (7)
state_test.go (1)

471-490: LGTM – implicit type-argument inference is fine

Dropping the explicit [T] from runGenericTest calls improves readability; Go’s type inference infers T from the slice literal, so this compiles on 1.22+. The explicit type arguments on GetState[...] remain necessary and are untouched. No issues here.

ctx.go (3)

871-876: LGTM! Switch statement improves readability and performance.

The refactoring from if-else to switch statement for character checking is well-implemented. This change improves code clarity when checking for IPv6 (:) and IPv4 (.) indicators in header parsing, and switch statements are generally more efficient for multiple condition checks.


922-927: LGTM! Consistent switch statement implementation.

This switch statement matches the pattern used in extractIPsFromHeader and provides the same performance and readability benefits. The logic for detecting IPv6 and IPv4 address formats is preserved and more clearly expressed.


1291-1291: LGTM! Generic function call simplification works correctly.

The removal of explicit generic type parameters from the Query function call is appropriate here. Go's type inference will correctly determine that V should be string based on the method signature func (c *DefaultCtx) Query(key string, defaultValue ...string) string and the call to Query[V GenericType](c Ctx, key string, defaultValue ...V) V. This change improves code readability while maintaining the same functionality.

ctx_test.go (3)

2514-2516: LGTM! Improved code clarity by relying on type inference.

The removal of explicit generic type parameters simplifies the function calls while maintaining the same functionality. Go's type inference can correctly determine the types from the values being stored ("doe" → string, 18 → int, true → bool).


2542-2542: LGTM! Simplified generic function call with type inference.

The explicit generic type parameter is correctly removed as Go can infer the User type from the struct literal value being passed to the Locals function.


3062-3062: LGTM! Type inference simplifies the Query function call.

The explicit generic type parameter is correctly removed as Go can infer the string type from the default value "default" being passed to the Query function.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request refactors the codebase by replacing if-else chains with switch statements and simplifying generic function calls. I've suggested a simplification in router.go to remove code duplication. Overall, the changes improve code quality.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 14, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 87.50000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.97%. Comparing base (c1e9ae3) to head (9c36728).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
ctx.go 85.71% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3578   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.96%   90.97%           
=======================================
  Files         111      111           
  Lines       11124    11121    -3     
=======================================
- Hits        10119    10117    -2     
- Misses        753      754    +1     
+ Partials      252      250    -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 90.97% <87.50%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@gaby gaby changed the title refactor: simplify generic function calls in context and state management 🧹 chore: Simplify generic function calls Jul 15, 2025
@gaby gaby added this to v3 Jul 15, 2025
@gaby gaby moved this to In Progress in v3 Jul 15, 2025
@gaby gaby added this to the v3 milestone Jul 15, 2025
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 merged commit 2832ae3 into gofiber:main Jul 16, 2025
13 of 14 checks passed
Copy link

welcome bot commented Jul 16, 2025

Congrats on merging your first pull request! 🎉 We here at Fiber are proud of you! If you need help or want to chat with us, join us on Discord https://gofiber.io/discord

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in v3 Jul 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants