♻️ refact(state): Use GetState to reduce duplicate code #3542
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes refactor the typed getter methods of the Changes
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @ksw2000, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on improving code consistency and reducing duplication within the State management system. By introducing a generic GetState function, the repetitive boilerplate code across numerous type-specific getter methods has been eliminated, leading to a more streamlined and maintainable codebase. Additionally, comments have been updated for better accuracy.
Highlights
- Code Refactoring: The core logic for retrieving type-specific values from the
Stateobject has been centralized. AllGetXXXmethods (e.g.,GetString,GetInt,GetBool, etc.) now delegate their operations to a genericGetStatehelper function, significantly reducing code duplication. - Code Consistency: Inconsistent comments for several
GetXXXmethods have been corrected to accurately reflect their return types, improving the clarity and consistency of the API documentation.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the state getter methods to use a generic GetState function, which reduces code duplication and improves maintainability. The correction of inconsistent comments is also a valuable fix. One minor suggestion improves consistency in the function signatures.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3542 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.71% 90.64% -0.08%
==========================================
Files 110 110
Lines 10954 10869 -85
==========================================
- Hits 9937 9852 -85
Misses 767 767
Partials 250 250
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Description
Use
GetStateto reduce duplicate code.Besides, fix inconsistent comment for
GetXXXType of change
Checklist
Before you submit your pull request, please make sure you meet these requirements:
/docs/directory for Fiber's documentation.