feat(gnokey): add gnokey version subcommand

[dujardin09]

Demo:

./gnokey version
gnokey version: master.2597+de4b5b56

resolves #4595

[Gno2D2]

🛠 PR Checks Summary

All Automated Checks passed. ✅

Manual Checks (for Reviewers):

• IGNORE the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)
• The pull request description provides enough details (checked by @thehowl)

Read More

🤖 This bot helps streamline PR reviews by verifying automated checks and providing guidance for contributors and reviewers.

✅ Automated Checks (for Contributors):

🟢 Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)
🟢 Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

☑️ Contributor Actions:

1. Fix any issues flagged by automated checks.
2. Follow the Contributor Checklist to ensure your PR is ready for review.
   • Add new tests, or document why they are unnecessary.
   • Provide clear examples/screenshots, if necessary.
   • Update documentation, if required.
   • Ensure no breaking changes, or include BREAKING CHANGE notes.
   • Link related issues/PRs, where applicable.

☑️ Reviewer Actions:

1. Complete manual checks for the PR, including the guidelines and additional checks if applicable.

📚 Resources:

• Report a bug with the bot.
• View the bot’s configuration file.

Debug

Automated Checks

Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 The pull request was created from a fork (head branch repo: dujardin09/gno)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 Maintainer can modify this pull request

Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: tech-staff)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 If
    ├── 🟢 Condition
    │   └── 🟢 Or
    │       ├── 🔴 At least one of these user(s) reviewed the pull request: [jefft0 leohhhn n0izn0iz notJoon omarsy x1unix] (with state "APPROVED")
    │       ├── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request
    │       └── 🔴 This pull request is a draft
    └── 🟢 Then
        └── 🟢 And
            ├── 🟢 Not (🔴 This label is applied to pull request: review/triage-pending)
            └── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request

Manual Checks

**IGNORE** the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 On every pull request

Can be checked by

• Any user with comment edit permission

The pull request description provides enough details

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: core-contributors)
    └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is user: dependabot[bot])

Can be checked by

• team core-contributors

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[Villaquiranm]

Hello hey thanks for your PR, it seems already doing what it is supposed to,
maybe add a little test on you new command ? (to get rid of the codecov pipeline failures)
you can inspire yourself from the tests on the same folder 🚀

[gfanton]

nice 👍

[thehowl]

I think maybe gnovm/pkg/version should be moved to tm2/, so that then all binaries can refer to that as a version

[zivkovicmilos]

It's a good start, but I think we can make it even better 🙌

[zivkovicmilos]

What do you think about doing just:

VERSION ?= $(shell git describe --tags --long --dirty --always)

GOBUILD_FLAGS ?= -ldflags=-X=github.com/gnolang/gno/tm2/pkg/version.Version=$(VERSION)

I'm not entirely convinced we need the branch name, if the commit hash is there 👀

cc @gfanton

[zivkovicmilos]

Also, don't we already version something like gnodev?

[dujardin09]

I applied the version format used for the binary subcommand gno version

[zivkovicmilos]

@dujardin09

Also, very important point:

Can you make sure these build changes are reflected in our release processes (goreleaser)? 🙏

cc @sw360cab

[thehowl]

Can you make sure the CI passes?

[dujardin09]

Done @thehowl