Skip to content

Conversation

ef4
Copy link
Contributor

@ef4 ef4 commented Aug 12, 2025

We found that the implementation of the @test decorator is identical in two different places.

Copy link
Contributor

This PRmain
Dev
600K └─┬ .
169K   ├── runtime
160K   ├── syntax
100K   ├── compiler
 58K   ├── opcode-compiler
 36K   ├── validator
 27K   ├── manager
 11K   ├── program
8.9K   ├── reference
7.2K   ├── destroyable
6.3K   ├── util
4.3K   ├── node
3.4K   ├── global-context
2.5K   ├── wire-format
1.0K   ├── vm
969B   ├── encoder
844B   ├── vm-babel-plugins
606B   └── owner
600K └─┬ .
169K   ├── runtime
160K   ├── syntax
100K   ├── compiler
 58K   ├── opcode-compiler
 36K   ├── validator
 27K   ├── manager
 11K   ├── program
8.9K   ├── reference
7.2K   ├── destroyable
6.3K   ├── util
4.3K   ├── node
3.4K   ├── global-context
2.5K   ├── wire-format
1.0K   ├── vm
969B   ├── encoder
844B   ├── vm-babel-plugins
606B   └── owner
Prod
236K └─┬ .
 70K   ├── syntax
 63K   ├── runtime
 48K   ├── compiler
 18K   ├── opcode-compiler
9.8K   ├── validator
7.9K   ├── manager
4.8K   ├── program
3.6K   ├── reference
2.4K   ├── util
2.1K   ├── node
1.6K   ├── wire-format
1.5K   ├── destroyable
737B   ├── vm
594B   ├── global-context
516B   ├── encoder
469B   ├── vm-babel-plugins
155B   └── owner
236K └─┬ .
 70K   ├── syntax
 63K   ├── runtime
 48K   ├── compiler
 18K   ├── opcode-compiler
9.8K   ├── validator
7.9K   ├── manager
4.8K   ├── program
3.6K   ├── reference
2.4K   ├── util
2.1K   ├── node
1.6K   ├── wire-format
1.5K   ├── destroyable
737B   ├── vm
594B   ├── global-context
516B   ├── encoder
469B   ├── vm-babel-plugins
155B   └── owner

@NullVoxPopuli NullVoxPopuli merged commit 36c4294 into main Aug 12, 2025
12 checks passed
@NullVoxPopuli NullVoxPopuli deleted the duplicate-decorator branch August 12, 2025 19:25
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Aug 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants