Skip to content

Conversation

gem-uhe
Copy link
Contributor

@gem-uhe gem-uhe commented Oct 2, 2025

No description provided.

gem-uhe and others added 3 commits September 25, 2025 16:25
The field appears to be called `timAnbieter` in the implementation. The spec was fixed accordingly in version 1.6.0 but the schema here still uses the wrong name.
Fix naming of timProvider field
@gem-uhe gem-uhe merged commit 9b2f9fe into develop Oct 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants