Skip to content

Collect GPO (Group Policy Objects) History #57

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 13, 2023

Conversation

pyrco
Copy link
Contributor

@pyrco pyrco commented Apr 11, 2023

(DIS-1747)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 11, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #57 (85b23b2) into main (ec1d419) will increase coverage by 0.20%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 85b23b2 differs from pull request most recent head fe7896a. Consider uploading reports for the commit fe7896a to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #57      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   38.71%   38.92%   +0.20%     
==========================================
  Files          21       21              
  Lines        2624     2844     +220     
==========================================
+ Hits         1016     1107      +91     
- Misses       1608     1737     +129     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 38.92% <ø> (+0.20%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
acquire/acquire.py 40.74% <ø> (+0.15%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@pyrco pyrco force-pushed the feature/dis-1747_collect-GPO-history branch from 85b23b2 to fe7896a Compare April 13, 2023 07:05
@pyrco pyrco merged commit a190845 into main Apr 13, 2023
@pyrco pyrco deleted the feature/dis-1747_collect-GPO-history branch April 13, 2023 07:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants