Skip to content

Conversation

jstucke
Copy link
Collaborator

@jstucke jstucke commented Aug 13, 2025

No description provided.

@jstucke jstucke requested a review from euwint August 13, 2025 13:54
@jstucke jstucke self-assigned this Aug 13, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 13, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 91.20000% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 91.98%. Comparing base (a392b42) to head (9626b2a).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/plugins/analysis/cve_lookup/internal/lookup.py 78.26% 5 Missing ⚠️
src/plugins/analysis/cve_lookup/code/cve_lookup.py 92.10% 3 Missing ⚠️
...analysis/cve_lookup/internal/busybox_cve_filter.py 66.66% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1394      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.90%   91.98%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         372      372              
  Lines       20955    20984      +29     
==========================================
+ Hits        19259    19302      +43     
+ Misses       1696     1682      -14     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Collaborator

@euwint euwint left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me :)

@euwint euwint merged commit f6c22d2 into master Sep 16, 2025
8 checks passed
@euwint euwint deleted the cve-lookup-v1 branch September 16, 2025 11:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants