Skip to content

Spelling fix for "Testing Flux Applications" #2254

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
zpao merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2014
Merged

Spelling fix for "Testing Flux Applications" #2254

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/_posts/2014-09-24-testing-flux-applications.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ var keys = Object.keys(all);
expect(all[keys[0]].text).toEqual('foo');
```

Puting it All Together
Putting it All Together
----------------------

The example Flux TodoMVC application has been updated with an example test for the TodoStore, but let's look at an abbreviated version of the entire test. The most important things to notice in this test are how we keep a reference to the store's registered callback in the closure of the test, and how we recreate the store before every test so that we clear the state of the store entirely.
Expand Down