[docs] Clarify wording on sub-tree reconciliation #2209
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The previous wording could be interpreted to mean sub-trees moving from within one sibling to within another, rather than the shuffling of siblings on a single level as intended
Member
|
Makes sense to me. |
zpao
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2014
[docs] Clarify wording on sub-tree reconciliation
zpao
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2014
[docs] Clarify wording on sub-tree reconciliation
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The previous wording could be interpreted to mean sub-trees moving from within one sibling to within another, rather than the shuffling of siblings on a single level as intended.
This was raised on the back of a query in IRC.