Skip to content

Conversation

@jimmyw
Copy link

@jimmyw jimmyw commented Oct 30, 2025

This is both a feature and an optimization.

Feature:
Adjustable size of the internal storage in esp_event queue, currently used by ISR posting, as they wont be able to make a malloc.

Optimization:
When non-isr is posting an event, use the inernal storage in the struct instead of always allocating a new heap for the data. Most events in esp-idf only contains a few bytes event information, and we have that allocation payed for anyway.

This solved in a big part our memory fragmentation issue, as events happens freqvently and used to create small memory allocations for just 4 bytes, and then in the event handler we usually allocated a bigger chunk of heap for our feature. When returning from the event handler, the 4 byte allocation was freed, leaveing a hole in the heap.

This is both a feature and an optimization.

Feature:
Adjustable size of the internal storage in esp_event queue, currently
used by ISR posting, as they wont be able to make a malloc.

Optimization:
When non-isr is posting an event, use the inernal storage in the struct
instead of always allocating a new heap for the data. Most events in
esp-idf only contains a few bytes event information, and we have that
allocation payed for anyway.

This solved in a big part our memory fragmentation issue, as events
happens freqvently and used to create small memory allocations for just
4 bytes, and then in the event handler we usually allocated a bigger
chunk of heap for our feature. When returning from the event handler,
the 4 byte allocation was freed, leaveing a hole in the heap.
@github-actions
Copy link

Messages
📖 🎉 Good Job! All checks are passing!

👋 Hello jimmyw, we appreciate your contribution to this project!


📘 Please review the project's Contributions Guide for key guidelines on code, documentation, testing, and more.

🖊️ Please also make sure you have read and signed the Contributor License Agreement for this project.

Click to see more instructions ...


This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...


We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests via this public GitHub repository.

This GitHub project is public mirror of our internal git repository

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved, we synchronize it into our internal git repository.
4. In the internal git repository we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
5. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.
5. On next sync from the internal git repository merged change will appear in this public GitHub repository.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 6f55218

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title feat(esp_event): Allow an event carry more data without malloc feat(esp_event): Allow an event carry more data without malloc (IDFGH-16709) Oct 30, 2025
@espressif-bot espressif-bot added the Status: Opened Issue is new label Oct 30, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@KonstantinKondrashov KonstantinKondrashov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@KonstantinKondrashov
Copy link
Collaborator

sha=6f552182c6622bf8f2a7aab096ed01cd7e658d1a

@KonstantinKondrashov KonstantinKondrashov added the PR-Sync-Merge Pull request sync as merge commit label Nov 5, 2025
@espressif-bot espressif-bot added Status: Reviewing Issue is being reviewed and removed Status: Opened Issue is new labels Nov 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

PR-Sync-Merge Pull request sync as merge commit Status: Reviewing Issue is being reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants