Skip to content

Conversation

@gcuendet
Copy link

Regarding my comment in PR #43 (see #43 (comment)), I was thinking about something like that:
when querying with a radius, use tree.query_ball_point instead of query such that you don't allocate a distances matrix of size NxN.

I ran the test_nearest_neighbor locally and it seems it is passing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant