Skip to content

Conversation

@chrisdennis
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@SamuelBussmann
Copy link

Thank you for the fix.
But doesn't InvocationScopedEventSink.fireOrdered still block on all events if any ordered listener was registered?
Maybe skip events without interested listeners and just consume the queue entry?

return listener;
}

public boolean isForEventType(EventType type) {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why this isForEventType check removed?

@Override
public void run() {
for(EventListenerWrapper<K, V> listenerWrapper : listenerWrappers) {
if (listenerWrapper.isForEventType(cacheEvent.getType())) {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why this isForEventType check removed?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

listenerWrappers are already correctly preselected to only contain relevant entries from *syncListenersList.get(event.getType()) ?

@chrisdennis
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you for the fix.
But doesn't InvocationScopedEventSink.fireOrdered still block on all events if any ordered listener was registered?
Maybe skip events without interested listeners and just consume the queue entry?

@SamuelBussmann you're right... we should be able to pull this higher and eliminate a lot more work. Let me move this back to draft and until I get time to rework it.

@chrisdennis chrisdennis marked this pull request as draft June 14, 2023 15:21
@SamuelBussmann
Copy link

SamuelBussmann commented Jun 14, 2023

@SamuelBussmann you're right... we should be able to pull this higher and eliminate a lot more work. Let me move this back to draft and until I get time to rework it.

Just add a filter, whether any listener is interested in this event at all? That should keep most of the events from even getting created.
And then a further optimization would be to group events by ordered listener to let the other events get past. But this will get tricky fast with Listeners implementing multiple events...

SamuelBussmann added a commit to SamuelBussmann/ehcache3 that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2023
Fixes ehcache#3169 : Track event listeners keyed by type to allow earlier event
firing veto ehcache#3170
SamuelBussmann added a commit to SamuelBussmann/ehcache3 that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
Fixes ehcache#3169 : Track event listeners keyed by type to allow earlier event
firing veto ehcache#3170
SamuelBussmann added a commit to SamuelBussmann/ehcache3 that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2025
Fixes ehcache#3169 : Track event listeners keyed by type to allow earlier event
firing veto ehcache#3170
SamuelBussmann added a commit to SamuelBussmann/ehcache3 that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2025
Fixes ehcache#3169 : Track event listeners keyed by type to allow earlier event
firing veto ehcache#3170
SamuelBussmann added a commit to SamuelBussmann/ehcache3 that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2025
Fixes ehcache#3169 : Track event listeners keyed by type to allow earlier event
firing veto ehcache#3170
SamuelBussmann added a commit to SamuelBussmann/ehcache3 that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2025
Fixes ehcache#3169 : Track event listeners keyed by type to allow earlier event
firing veto ehcache#3170
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants