Skip to content

Implement includes operator #342

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

stavrogyn
Copy link

Description

includes is implemented according to the issue

The operator checking if a store (containing either a string or an array) includes a specified value.

Checklist for a new method

  • Create a directory for the new method in the src directory in param-case
  • Place the source code to src/method-name/index.ts in ESModules export in camelCase named export
  • Add tests to src/method-name/method-name.test.ts
  • Add fork tests to src/method-name/method-name.fork.test.ts
  • Add type tests to test-typings/method-name.ts
    • Use // @ts-expect-error to mark expected type error
    • import { expectType } from 'tsd' to check expected return type
  • Add documentation in src/method-name/readme.md
    • Add header Patronum/MethodName
    • Add section with overloads, if have
    • Add Motivation, Formulae, Arguments and Return sections for each overload
    • Add useful examples in Example section for each overload
  • Fill frontmatter in src/method-name/readme.md
    • Add title. Make sure it uses camelCase syntax just like the method itself
    • Add slug. Use param-case to write it. In most cases it will be just like title
    • Add desription with one short sentence describing what method useful for
    • Add group. To categorize method on /operators page. Full list of available groups, you can see in documentation/src/content/config.ts

Comment on lines 20 to 24
if (typeof a === 'number') {
throw new Error('first argument should be an unit of array or string');
}

return a.includes(b as string);
Copy link
Contributor

@earthspacon earthspacon Nov 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a must be either an array or a string, so I would write it like this:

if (typeof a === 'string') {
      return a.includes(b as string);
}

throw new Error('First argument should be a unit of array or string');

I'm not a maintainer, just decided to leave a comment :)

Comment on lines +7 to +10
export function includes <T extends string | number>(
a: Store<Array<T>>,
b: Store<T> | T,
): Store<boolean>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why only string | number?

Comment on lines +3 to +10
export function includes <T extends string>(
a: Store<T>,
b: Store<T> | T,
): Store<boolean>
export function includes <T extends string | number>(
a: Store<Array<T>>,
b: Store<T> | T,
): Store<boolean>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What if:

Suggested change
export function includes <T extends string>(
a: Store<T>,
b: Store<T> | T,
): Store<boolean>
export function includes <T extends string | number>(
a: Store<Array<T>>,
b: Store<T> | T,
): Store<boolean>
export function includes <T extends string>(
a: Store<T>,
b: Store<T> | T,
): Store<boolean>
export function includes <T>(
a: Store<Array<T>>,
b: Store<T> | T,
): Store<boolean>
export function includes <T>(
a: Store<{ ref: Set<T> }>,
b: Store<T> | T,
): Store<boolean>

allow to compare with any list of items?

Comment on lines +12 to +13
a: Store<T | Array<T>>,
b: Store<T> | T,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
a: Store<T | Array<T>>,
b: Store<T> | T,
haystack: Store<T | Array<T>>,
needle: Store<T> | T,

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think a, b is not clearly explains what in what we checking:

includes($email, "@");
includes("@", $email);

it will work by types in both ways, but IDE will suggest a:, b: names which is not self-descriptive, I think

const $array = createStore([1, 2, 3]);
const $isInclude = includes($array, 2);

console.assert($isInclude.getState() === true);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think is better do not recommend using .getState() in documentation.

Suggested change
console.assert($isInclude.getState() === true);
$isInclude // => true

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants