Skip to content

armhf support #108

@moschlar

Description

@moschlar

#107 made us loose armhf support but enabled us to support the current (official) docker base image.

Maybe it would be easier to have that nowadays, but that would require someone digging into it.

PRs welcome!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions