-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 235
Re-enable passing chat template to model #1732
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Re-enable passing chat template to model #1732
Conversation
Fixes: containers#1202 Re-enable passing the chat template to running/serving the model as the issue where using the template lowers the quality of the output seems to be solved. Signed-off-by: Michael Engel <[email protected]>
Reviewer's GuideRestored the logic to pass a chat template file to the Llama serving command by uncommenting and integrating the existing code path. Sequence diagram for passing chat template to model servingsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Model
participant LlamaServeProcess
User->>Model: Call llama_serve(args)
Model->>Model: _get_chat_template_path(args.container, args.generate, args.dryrun)
alt chat_template_path is not None
Model->>LlamaServeProcess: Start with --chat-template-file <path>
else chat_template_path is None
Model->>LlamaServeProcess: Start without --chat-template-file
end
Class diagram for llama_serve method updateclassDiagram
class Model {
llama_serve(args)
_get_chat_template_path(container, generate, dryrun)
}
Model : +llama_serve(args)
Model : +_get_chat_template_path(container, generate, dryrun)
Model : llama_serve now calls _get_chat_template_path and may add --chat-template-file to exec_args
File-Level Changes
Possibly linked issues
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @engelmi, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request restores a previously disabled feature that allows passing a chat template to the model serving process. The re-enablement is based on the resolution of an earlier issue where the template negatively impacted model output quality, aiming to improve or stabilize model behavior with templates.
Highlights
- Feature Re-enablement: Re-enabled the functionality to pass a chat template file to the model serving process. This was previously disabled due to an issue where using the template lowered output quality, which is now reported as resolved.
- Issue Resolution: This change directly addresses and resolves the issue tracked in
https://github.com/containers/ramalama/issues/1202
by restoring the chat template functionality.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request re-enables passing a chat template to the model. The change is simple and just uncomments a few lines of code. However, I've found a potential issue in the re-enabled code related to handling dry_run
mode, which could pass an invalid empty string as a file path. I've provided a suggestion to make the check more robust.
LGTM |
Fixes: #1202
Re-enable passing the chat template to running/serving the model as the issue where using the template lowers the quality of the output seems to be solved.
Summary by Sourcery
Enhancements: