-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 235
Make model argument mandatory #1574
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Reviewer's GuideThis PR enforces a mandatory MODEL parameter by adding it as a required positional argument in the CLI, removes internal model inference methods, and updates the chat request to use args.MODEL directly. Class diagram for updated Chat class structureclassDiagram
class Chat {
- args
- url
- models_url
- conversation_history
+ __init__(args)
+ handle_args()
+ _make_request_data()
}
%% Removed methods
%% - model(index=0)
%% - get_models()
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @ericcurtin, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request modifies the ramalama chat
command to enforce the explicit provision of a model argument. This change standardizes the command-line interface for consistency with other ramalama
commands and simplifies the internal chat client by removing its responsibility for model discovery, which is beneficial for environments with dynamic model management.
Highlights
- Mandatory Model Argument: The
ramalama chat
command now requires aMODEL
argument to be explicitly provided by the user, making it a mandatory positional argument. This aligns the command's behavior withramalama run
. - Simplified Model Handling: The internal
ramalama/chat.py
client code has been streamlined by removing the logic responsible for discovering and managing available models. The chat client now directly uses the model provided via command-line arguments. - Support for Inferencing Servers: This change provides necessary support for inferencing servers that implement model-swapping, as they often require the model to be specified upfront rather than being inferred or auto-discovered.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @ericcurtin - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request makes the MODEL
argument for the ramalama chat
command mandatory, which aligns it with the ramalama run
command. The changes are straightforward and correctly implement the intended behavior by updating the argument parser and removing the now-obsolete dynamic model fetching logic. My feedback includes a suggestion to remove a now-unused class attribute and to add system tests to verify this new mandatory argument behavior and prevent future regressions.
@@ -921,6 +921,7 @@ def chat_parser(subparsers): | |||
) | |||
parser.add_argument("--prefix", type=str, help="prefix for the user prompt", default=default_prefix()) | |||
parser.add_argument("--url", type=str, default="http://127.0.0.1:8080", help="the host to send requests to") | |||
parser.add_argument("MODEL", completer=local_models) # positional argument |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change correctly makes the MODEL
argument mandatory for the chat
command. To ensure this behavior is maintained and to prevent future regressions, it would be beneficial to add a system test.
You could add a new test case that verifies:
- Running
ramalama chat
without a model name fails with an appropriate error message. - Running
ramalama chat my-model
proceeds past argument parsing (it might fail later due to connection errors, which is fine for this test).
This would improve the test coverage for the chat
command.
To be consistent with "ramalama run" experience. Inferencing servers that have implemented model-swapping require this. In the case of servers like llama-server that only load one server, any value is sufficient. Signed-off-by: Eric Curtin <[email protected]>
8862d12
to
cb8ab96
Compare
LGTM |
To be consistent with "ramalama run" experience. Inferencing
servers that have implemented model-swapping require this. In the
case of servers like llama-server that only load one server, any
value is sufficient.