Skip to content

fix: remove unneeded dependency from Llama Stack container #1503

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2025

Conversation

nathan-weinberg
Copy link
Collaborator

@nathan-weinberg nathan-weinberg commented Jun 11, 2025

partially reverts #1484

blobfile dependency is already included in ramalama-stack version 0.2.0

adding it explicitly is unnecessarily

Summary by Sourcery

Build:

  • Remove explicit 'blobfile' installation from the Llama Stack container image

`blobfile` dependency is already included in ramalama-stack version 0.2.0
adding it explicitly is unnecessarily

Signed-off-by: Nathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jun 11, 2025

It was not in the container when I built it. I will try again.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jun 11, 2025

Ok I just tried it again with this change, and now I am seeing the blobfile, do not know what happened last week.

@rhatdan rhatdan merged commit 003612a into containers:main Jun 11, 2025
14 of 16 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @nathan-weinberg - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants