Reasoning flag

[ericcurtin]

Feature request description

More great work from @ochafik , we should look into the flag, maybe add it as an explicit option to RamaLama document it:

ggml-org/llama.cpp#13771

It can be used to define the amount of reasoning you want, to the point one can completely turn off reasoning if they'd like.

Suggest potential solution

No response

Have you considered any alternatives?

No response

Additional context

No response

[ericcurtin]

@rhatdan the alias we have:

deepseek -> deepseek-r1

is sometimes questionable.

deepseek-r1 is the reasoning one
deepseek-v3 is the non-reasoning one (it's MoE technically)

There's also more specific ones like:

deepseek-coder

I guess deepseek-v3 is the most generic one, but reasoning via deepseek-r1 is what made deepseek famous.

[rhatdan]

Well shouldwe change deepseek -> deepseek-v3?

[ericcurtin]

Well shouldwe change deepseek -> deepseek-v3?

I actually think that's worse, because r1 is the "famous" one.

deepseek-r2 should be out soon.

[rhatdan]

@ericcurtin is this still an issue?