-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 173
Feature/years of experience #1120
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/years of experience #1120
Conversation
|
@leslycatota1 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Codú Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce a new field, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
I don't know how to take these commits out: Added Drizzle to README.md, Merge branch 'develop' into develop. I thought I cherry-picked but maybe that was not the case. I'll try to do it again but any tips? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
drizzle/0010-yearsOfExperiece (2)
1-5: Consider NOT NULL constraint and use migration versioning.The new "yearsOfExperience" column allows NULL values by default. Consider if this is the intended behavior. If not, you may want to add a NOT NULL constraint.
Also, it's a good practice to include the migration version in the SQL file for better traceability. Consider renaming the file to something like
0010_add_years_of_experience.sql.You can modify the ALTER TABLE statement like this:
ALTER TABLE "User" ADD COLUMN "yearsOfExperience" text NOT NULL DEFAULT '0-1';This assumes '0-1' is a valid default value. Adjust as needed based on your requirements.
7-12: Approved with a minor optimization suggestion.The CHECK constraint implementation looks good. It correctly limits the "yearsOfExperience" values to the specified range and uses proper error handling.
For a minor optimization, you could combine both ALTER TABLE statements into a single DO block:
DO $$ BEGIN ALTER TABLE "User" ADD COLUMN "yearsOfExperience" text, ADD CONSTRAINT "User_yearsOfExperience_check" CHECK ("yearsOfExperience" IN ('0-1', '1-3', '3-5', '5-8', '8-12', '12+')); EXCEPTION WHEN duplicate_column THEN -- Column already exists, try to add just the constraint ALTER TABLE "User" ADD CONSTRAINT "User_yearsOfExperience_check" CHECK ("yearsOfExperience" IN ('0-1', '1-3', '3-5', '5-8', '8-12', '12+')); WHEN duplicate_object THEN null; END $$;This approach reduces the number of separate operations and handles cases where the column might exist but the constraint doesn't.
schema/additionalUserDetails.ts (1)
33-38: Approve changes with a suggestion for improved type safety.The implementation of the
yearsOfExperiencefield looks good and aligns well with the PR objectives. It's correctly defined as optional and includes proper validation against theyearsOfExperienceOptions.For improved type safety, consider using
z.enum()instead ofz.string(). This will ensure that the type is inferred correctly and provide better autocomplete support. Here's how you can modify the field:yearsOfExperience: z .enum(yearsOfExperienceOptions as [YearsOfExperience, ...YearsOfExperience[]]) .optional(),This change eliminates the need for the custom refinement while still ensuring type safety and validation.
app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/_client.tsx (2)
Line range hint
435-446: Correct the variable naming and logic in form validationThe variable
isErroris used to store the result oftrigger(), which returnstruewhen the validation passes. This can be misleading and might cause logic errors. Consider renamingisErrortoisValidand adjusting the conditional logic accordingly.Apply this diff to fix the variable naming and logic:
-let isError = await trigger(["professionalOrStudent"]); +let isValid = await trigger(["professionalOrStudent"]); -if (isError && professionalOrStudent === "Working professional") { - isError = await trigger(["workplace", "jobTitle", "yearsOfExperience"]); +if (isValid && professionalOrStudent === "Working professional") { + isValid = await trigger(["workplace", "jobTitle", "yearsOfExperience"]); } -if (isError && professionalOrStudent === "Current student") { - isError = await trigger(["levelOfStudy", "course"]); +if (isValid && professionalOrStudent === "Current student") { + isValid = await trigger(["levelOfStudy", "course"]); } -if (isError) { +if (isValid) { try { const isSuccess = await slideThreeSubmitAction(data); // ...
530-536: ReuseyearsOfExperienceOptionsfor consistencyInstead of hardcoding the options in the select input, consider mapping over the
yearsOfExperienceOptionsarray. This promotes consistency and simplifies future updates.Apply this diff:
- <option value="0-1">0-1 years</option> - <option value="1-3">1-3 years</option> - <option value="3-5">3-5 years</option> - <option value="5-8">5-8 years</option> - <option value="8-12">8-12 years</option> - <option value="12+">12+ years</option> + {yearsOfExperienceOptions.map((experience) => ( + <option key={experience} value={experience}> + {experience} years + </option> + ))}This ensures the options remain in sync with the defined constants.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/_client.tsx (7 hunks)
- app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/page.tsx (3 hunks)
- drizzle/0010-yearsOfExperiece (1 hunks)
- schema/additionalUserDetails.ts (2 hunks)
- server/db/schema.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (10)
drizzle/0010-yearsOfExperiece (1)
1-12: Overall, the migration script looks good with room for minor improvements.The script successfully adds the "yearsOfExperience" column to the User table and implements the required constraint. The error handling makes the migration idempotent, which is a good practice.
To ensure the changes are correctly reflected in the database schema, please run the following script:
This script will help verify that the column and constraint are properly added to the database schema and that the constraint is working as expected.
schema/additionalUserDetails.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-38: Summary: Implementation meets requirements with minor suggestions for improvementThe changes successfully implement the "Years of experience" field in the onboarding form, meeting the requirements outlined in the PR objectives and linked issue. The implementation is consistent with the existing code structure and includes proper validation using Zod schema.
Key points:
- The new field is correctly added to the
slideThreeSchema.- Proper validation is implemented to ensure only valid options are accepted.
- The changes do not introduce any breaking changes.
Suggestions for improvement:
- Consider moving shared constants to a common file to avoid potential server-side rendering issues.
- Use
z.enum()for improved type safety in theyearsOfExperiencefield definition.Overall, the implementation is solid and achieves the desired functionality. Addressing the minor suggestions will further enhance the code quality and maintainability.
server/db/schema.ts (1)
230-230: Consider data type and migration strategy foryearsOfExperienceThe addition of the
yearsOfExperiencefield to theusertable is a good implementation of the requested feature. However, there are a few points to consider:
Data type: The
varchartype allows for flexibility, but it may complicate numerical comparisons or calculations. Consider using anenumorintegertype if strict categories are preferred.Migration strategy: Ensure there's a migration plan to populate this field for existing user records.
UI consistency: Verify that the options in the UI dropdown match the expected format for this field (e.g., "0-1", "1-3", etc.).
Validation: Implement proper validation to ensure only valid values are stored in this field.
To verify the consistency between the schema and the UI implementation, please run the following script:
This script will help identify where and how the
yearsOfExperiencefield is implemented in the UI, allowing us to verify consistency with the schema definition.app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/page.tsx (1)
27-27: IncludeyearsOfExperiencein user queryIncluding
yearsOfExperiencein the user query is appropriate and aligns with the new feature requirements.app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/_client.tsx (6)
43-44: LGTM: Addition ofyearsOfExperienceOptionsandYearsOfExperienceThe definition of
yearsOfExperienceOptionsand the corresponding typeYearsOfExperienceis clear and follows best practices.
56-56: LGTM: UpdatingUserDetailstypeIncluding
yearsOfExperiencein theUserDetailstype ensures that the new field is properly tracked and managed.
74-74: LGTM: DestructuringyearsOfExperiencefromdetailsProperly destructuring
yearsOfExperienceallows for its seamless use within the component.
406-406: LGTM: IncludingyearsOfExperienceinSlideThreeAdding
yearsOfExperienceto the destructureddetailsinSlideThreeensures that the value is accessible within the form.
424-424: LGTM: SettingyearsOfExperiencein form default valuesIncluding
yearsOfExperiencein thedefaultValuesof the form maintains consistency and supports form state management.
520-542:⚠️ Potential issueUse
watchinstead ofgetValuesfor reactive form updatesUsing
getValues("professionalOrStudent")for conditional rendering does not trigger re-renders when the value changes. This may cause the form not to update the UI as expected when the user changes their selection. Consider usingwatch("professionalOrStudent")to ensure the UI updates reactively.Apply this diff:
- const professionalOrStudent = getValues("professionalOrStudent"); + const professionalOrStudent = watch("professionalOrStudent");Then, update the conditional rendering:
- {getValues("professionalOrStudent") === "Working professional" && ( + {professionalOrStudent === "Working professional" && (Ensure that
watchis properly utilized in your component for reactive updates.Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
| import z from "zod"; | |||
|
|
|||
| import { yearsOfExperienceOptions, YearsOfExperience } from "@/app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/_client"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider moving shared constants to a common file.
Importing from a client-side file (@/app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/_client) in a schema definition might lead to issues in server-side rendering or API routes. This could potentially cause errors or unexpected behavior in a server environment where client-side modules are not available.
Consider moving the yearsOfExperienceOptions and YearsOfExperience to a shared constants file that can be safely imported in both client and server environments. For example:
// shared/constants.ts
export const yearsOfExperienceOptions = [...] as const;
export type YearsOfExperience = typeof yearsOfExperienceOptions[number];Then update the import statement:
import { yearsOfExperienceOptions, YearsOfExperience } from "@/shared/constants";This approach ensures that these constants are accessible throughout your application without risking server-side rendering issues.
| yearsOfExperience: details?.yearsOfExperience && | ||
| ["0-1", "1-3", "3-5", "5-8", "8-12", "12+"].includes(details.yearsOfExperience) | ||
| ? details.yearsOfExperience as YearsOfExperience // Cast to the union type | ||
| : "0-1", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Handle unexpected yearsOfExperience values appropriately
Defaulting to "0-1" when details.yearsOfExperience contains an unexpected value might not reflect the user's actual experience. Consider handling invalid or unexpected values more explicitly, possibly by prompting the user to re-enter their information or by logging the discrepancy.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify the yearsOfExperience assignment for better readability
The current assignment logic can be simplified to enhance readability and maintainability. Checking for details?.yearsOfExperience within the includes method suffices.
Consider applying this diff:
-yearsOfExperience: details?.yearsOfExperience &&
- ["0-1", "1-3", "3-5", "5-8", "8-12", "12+"].includes(details.yearsOfExperience)
- ? details.yearsOfExperience as YearsOfExperience // Cast to the union type
- : "0-1",
+yearsOfExperience: ["0-1", "1-3", "3-5", "5-8", "8-12", "12+"].includes(details?.yearsOfExperience)
+ ? (details.yearsOfExperience as YearsOfExperience) // Cast to the union type
+ : "0-1",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| yearsOfExperience: details?.yearsOfExperience && | |
| ["0-1", "1-3", "3-5", "5-8", "8-12", "12+"].includes(details.yearsOfExperience) | |
| ? details.yearsOfExperience as YearsOfExperience // Cast to the union type | |
| : "0-1", | |
| yearsOfExperience: ["0-1", "1-3", "3-5", "5-8", "8-12", "12+"].includes(details?.yearsOfExperience) | |
| ? (details.yearsOfExperience as YearsOfExperience) // Cast to the union type | |
| : "0-1", |
| import Content from "./_client"; | ||
| import { getServerAuthSession } from "@/server/auth"; | ||
| import { db } from "@/server/db"; | ||
| import {YearsOfExperience} from "./_client"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consolidate imports from the same module
To improve code clarity and organization, consider combining the imports from "./_client" into a single statement.
Apply this diff:
-import Content from "./_client";
-import {YearsOfExperience} from "./_client";
+import Content, { YearsOfExperience } from "./_client";Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
✨ Codu Pull Request 💻
Fixes #1009
Pull Request details
Any Breaking changes
Associated Screenshots