Skip to content

Conversation

@DaisyGuti
Copy link
Contributor

@DaisyGuti DaisyGuti commented Oct 15, 2025

Ticket

Resolves #4239 Part of Parent #3825

Changes

  • UI updates to nav bar to make legacy look like the Enterprise Mode version
  • UI updates to the background so it is the light gray

Context for reviewers

https://cisa-corp.slack.com/archives/C05BGB4L5NF/p1759239519393089

Setup

  1. Login to https://getgov-potato.app.cloud.gov/admin
  2. Remove yourself from all portfolios so you can see the legacy only view
  3. Legacy view should look like the new portfolio view colorwise.(compare against staging with portfolio permissions OR re-add your portfolio permissions and refresh the page)

Code Review Verification Steps

As the original developer, I have

Satisfied acceptance criteria and met development standards

  • Met the acceptance criteria, or will meet them in a subsequent PR
  • Created/modified automated tests
  • Update documentation in READMEs and/or onboarding guide

Ensured code standards are met (Original Developer)

  • If any updated dependencies on Pipfile, also update dependencies in requirements.txt.
  • Interactions with external systems are wrapped in try/except
  • Error handling exists for unusual or missing values

Validated user-facing changes (if applicable)

  • Follow the process for requesting a design review. If code is not user-facing, delete design reviewer checklist
  • Verify new pages have been added to .pa11yci file so that they will be tested with our automated accessibility testing
  • Checked keyboard navigability
  • Tested general usability, landmarks, page header structure, and links with a screen reader (such as Voiceover or ANDI)

As a code reviewer, I have

Reviewed, tested, and left feedback about the changes

  • Pulled this branch locally and tested it
  • Verified code meets all checks above. Address any checks that are not satisfied
  • Reviewed this code and left comments. Indicate if comments must be addressed before code is merged
  • Checked that all code is adequately covered by tests
  • Verify migrations are valid and do not conflict with existing migrations

Validated user-facing changes as a developer

Note: Multiple code reviewers can share the checklists above, a second reviewer should not make a duplicate checklist. All checks should be checked before approving, even those labeled N/A.

  • New pages have been added to .pa11yci file so that they will be tested with our automated accessibility testing
  • Checked keyboard navigability
  • Meets all designs and user flows provided by design/product
  • Tested general usability, landmarks, page header structure, and links with a screen reader (such as Voiceover or ANDI)
  • (Rarely needed) Tested as both an analyst and applicant user

As a designer reviewer, I have

Verified that the changes match the design intention

  • Checked that the design translated visually
  • Checked behavior. Comment any found issues or broken flows.
  • Checked different states (empty, one, some, error)
  • Checked for landmarks, page heading structure, and links

Validated user-facing changes as a designer

  • Checked keyboard navigability
  • Tested general usability, landmarks, page header structure, and links with a screen reader (such as Voiceover or ANDI)
  • Tested with multiple browsers (check off which ones were used)
    • Chrome
    • Microsoft Edge
    • FireFox
    • Safari
  • (Rarely needed) Tested as both an analyst and applicant user

References

Screenshots

@DaisyGuti DaisyGuti changed the title Make legacy header and background match EM 4239: Make legacy header and background match EM Oct 15, 2025
@DaisyGuti DaisyGuti changed the title 4239: Make legacy header and background match EM #4239: Make legacy header and background match EM Oct 15, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox potato.

@DaisyGuti DaisyGuti requested a review from a team October 15, 2025 18:51
@DaisyGuti DaisyGuti moved this to 👀 In review in .gov Product Board Oct 15, 2025
@DaisyGuti DaisyGuti moved this from 👀 In review to 🎯 Ready in .gov Product Board Oct 15, 2025
@DaisyGuti DaisyGuti added the design-review dev ticket needing design review label Oct 15, 2025
@kimallen kimallen self-assigned this Oct 15, 2025
@kimallen
Copy link
Contributor

@DaisyGuti I remember seeing a thread about this, though not sure the desired outcome. On the legacy view, the email (profile) and the "logout" are white, whereas they are a light blue in the org view. Is that what is desired?

@SamiyahKey SamiyahKey requested review from SamiyahKey and removed request for a team October 15, 2025 23:01
Copy link

@SamiyahKey SamiyahKey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@kimallen kimallen moved this from 🎯 Ready to 👀 In review in .gov Product Board Oct 16, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@kimallen kimallen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I talked with Samiyah and sounds like we're going with the interpretation of the designs that has different colors between Enterprise and legacy headers, so LGTM!

@DaisyGuti
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DaisyGuti I remember seeing a thread about this, though not sure the desired outcome. On the legacy view, the email (profile) and the "logout" are white, whereas they are a light blue in the org view. Is that what is desired?

Never ending question haha, I saw variances as well.. but I think we are going with white.

@github-actions
Copy link

🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox potato.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

design-review dev ticket needing design review

Projects

Status: 👀 In review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Styling updates to legacy UI

3 participants