Skip to content

Conversation

ti-mo
Copy link
Collaborator

@ti-mo ti-mo commented Mar 20, 2024

As discussed at the Cilium Dev Summit 2024, this codifies review assignments and expectations around interactivity on PR reviews.


We understand there are potentially multiple candidates for some packages, but to reduce potential bystander effect, we want to start off by assigning a single code owner and seeing where that goes. Over time, we can add multiple code owners for the more active packages.

@ti-mo ti-mo requested a review from a team as a code owner March 20, 2024 12:12
…rink

As discussed at the Cilium Dev Summit 2024, this codifies review assignments
and expectations around interactivity on PR reviews.

Signed-off-by: Timo Beckers <[email protected]>
@ti-mo ti-mo force-pushed the tb/package-codeowners branch from baf13d1 to 61f824e Compare March 20, 2024 12:35
@ti-mo ti-mo merged commit 9330be4 into cilium:main Mar 21, 2024
@ti-mo ti-mo deleted the tb/package-codeowners branch March 21, 2024 08:40
@lmb
Copy link
Collaborator

lmb commented Mar 21, 2024

Thanks everyone!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants