Support in rule for repeated int32 and int64 fields
#1241
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mortezaPRK
changed the title
in rule for repeated in32 and in64in rule for repeated int32 and int64
rodaine
changed the title
in rule for repeated int32 and int64in rule for repeated int32 and int64 fields
rodaine
approved these changes
Feb 3, 2025
Member
rodaine
left a comment
rodaine
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Awesome! Thanks again, @mortezaPRK
Contributor
Author
|
@rodaine Do you know when a new release is published for this changes? For now I'm using |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Second part of the #1240
This PR adds support for
inrule forrepeated int32/int64fields for CUpdated the testcases