Add support for ... to some plot_ functions #184
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi,
Thanks for developing this library, it is awesome!
This PR adds support for ... arguments to some of the plotting functions. This allows to supply additional parameters to the plots, like fill, color, alpha, size, etc.
For example:
This will pot boxplots as per the normal plot_boxplot function, but it will also pass the size and fill argument to the plotting function.
Why this change?
I like to compare train and test datasets, to see if they have similar distributions. So I frequently do something like this:
By passing additional arguments to the plotting functions, I can visualize train and test in the same plot, and compare their distribution.
I've also added a test file, which simply checks whether the functions return error. Happy to add more tests if needed.