Skip to content

Conversation

jlandisBox
Copy link
Contributor

@jlandisBox jlandisBox commented Aug 14, 2025

…x styling

AI Agent Selector is now left aligned:

Before:

Screenshot 2025-08-14 at 2 25 44 PM

After:

Screenshot 2025-08-14 at 2 24 46 PM

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • AI agent selector now appears whenever AI Autofill is enabled within cascade settings, improving discoverability and workflow.
    • Updated selector alignment to left for a cleaner, more consistent layout.
  • Tests

    • Updated test suites to reflect the streamlined AI agent selector behavior and naming.
  • Chores

    • Upgraded AI agent selector dependency to the latest minor version for compatibility and improvements.

@jlandisBox jlandisBox requested review from a team as code owners August 14, 2025 18:44
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 14, 2025

Walkthrough

Removed the canUseAIFolderExtractionAgentSelector prop across Metadata Instance Editor components and tests; simplified CascadePolicy AI selector rendering to depend on isAIFolderExtractionEnabled; added selectorAlignment="left" to BoxAiAgentSelectorWithApiContainer; updated stories accordingly; bumped @box/box-ai-agent-selector to ^0.53.0.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of changes
Component API cleanup
src/features/metadata-instance-editor/CascadePolicy.js, .../Instance.js, .../Instances.js, .../MetadataInstanceEditor.js
Removed canUseAIFolderExtractionAgentSelector from Props and usage; simplified AI selector render guard to rely on isAIFolderExtractionEnabled; added selectorAlignment="left" to BoxAiAgentSelectorWithApiContainer; stopped forwarding removed prop.
Tests updates
src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/CascadePolicy.test.js, .../__tests__/Instance.test.js, .../__tests__/Instances.test.js, .../__tests__/MetadataInstanceEditor.test.js
Deleted tests/props referencing canUseAIFolderExtractionAgentSelector; updated suites and cases to rely on canUseAIFolderExtraction and new behavior; removed gating tests; added selection test for “Enhanced”.
Storybook visual tests
src/features/metadata-instance-editor/stories/tests/CascadePolicy-visual.stories.js
Removed canUseAIFolderExtractionAgentSelector from baseProps.
Dependencies
package.json
Bumped @box/box-ai-agent-selector from ^0.52.0 to ^0.53.0 in devDependencies and peerDependencies.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  participant User
  participant MetadataInstanceEditor
  participant Instances
  participant Instance
  participant CascadePolicy
  participant AIAgentSelector

  User->>MetadataInstanceEditor: Open editor
  MetadataInstanceEditor->>Instances: Render (canUseAIFolderExtraction)
  Instances->>Instance: Render
  Instance->>CascadePolicy: Render with cascade config
  CascadePolicy-->>CascadePolicy: Check shouldShowCascadeOptions && isAIFolderExtractionEnabled
  CascadePolicy->>AIAgentSelector: Render (selectorAlignment="left")
  User->>AIAgentSelector: Select agent
  AIAgentSelector-->>CascadePolicy: onSelectAgent callback
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ready-to-merge

Suggested reviewers

  • tjuanitas
  • marcoartaviaq
  • patlm

Poem

I thump my paws in tidy delight,
One less flag to guard the night;
Selector slides to the left—just so,
Enhanced or Standard, pick and go.
With version hops and tests made neat,
This bunny’s review is short and sweet. 🐇✨

Tip

🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!

Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these settings in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f969170 and 2e7c3db.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/__snapshots__/Instance.test.js.snap is excluded by !**/*.snap
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/__snapshots__/Instances.test.js.snap is excluded by !**/*.snap
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/__snapshots__/MetadataInstanceEditor.test.js.snap is excluded by !**/*.snap
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/CascadePolicy.js (1 hunks)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/CascadePolicy.scss (1 hunks)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/Instance.js (0 hunks)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/Instances.js (0 hunks)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/MetadataInstanceEditor.js (0 hunks)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/CascadePolicy.test.js (0 hunks)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/Instance.test.js (0 hunks)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/Instances.test.js (0 hunks)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/MetadataInstanceEditor.test.js (0 hunks)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/stories/tests/CascadePolicy-visual.stories.js (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (8)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/Instance.js
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/stories/tests/CascadePolicy-visual.stories.js
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/tests/MetadataInstanceEditor.test.js
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/Instances.js
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/MetadataInstanceEditor.js
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/tests/Instances.test.js
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/tests/Instance.test.js
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/tests/CascadePolicy.test.js
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: ahorowitz123
PR: box/box-ui-elements#4102
File: src/features/metadata-instance-editor/Instance.js:647-649
Timestamp: 2025-05-14T17:46:25.370Z
Learning: In the metadata-instance-editor component, `isExistingAIExtractionCascadePolicy` specifically checks if the cascade policy fetched from the backend has AI folder extraction enabled, using props rather than state to reflect the original server-side configuration rather than current UI state.
📚 Learning: 2025-05-14T17:46:25.370Z
Learnt from: ahorowitz123
PR: box/box-ui-elements#4102
File: src/features/metadata-instance-editor/Instance.js:647-649
Timestamp: 2025-05-14T17:46:25.370Z
Learning: In the metadata-instance-editor component, `isExistingAIExtractionCascadePolicy` specifically checks if the cascade policy fetched from the backend has AI folder extraction enabled, using props rather than state to reflect the original server-side configuration rather than current UI state.

Applied to files:

  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/CascadePolicy.scss
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/CascadePolicy.js
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: lint_test_build
  • GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/features/metadata-instance-editor/CascadePolicy.js (1)

195-204: Rendering guard change: confirm it honors existing server-side AI settings

The selector now renders when isAIFolderExtractionEnabled is true. Per prior learnings (about isExistingAIExtractionCascadePolicy reflecting server-side config), please confirm isAIFolderExtractionEnabled is derived from the canonical server value for existing cascade policies. Otherwise, for an existing AI-enabled policy with a locked toggle, the selector might not render, preventing users from seeing which agent is configured.

If there’s any chance isAIFolderExtractionEnabled reflects only current UI state, consider gating on a prop that encodes the server state for existing policies (e.g., isExistingAIExtractionCascadePolicy), or derive isAIFolderExtractionEnabled from it during initialization so the selector still renders (disabled) for existing AI-enabled policies.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/MetadataInstanceEditor.test.js (1)

542-544: Align initial toggle assertion with provided props (isEnabled currently true in base props)

getMetadataEditorBaseProps() sets cascadePolicy.isEnabled: true. The test expects the "Enable Cascade Policy" switch to be unchecked before clicking, which contradicts that default. Make the initial state explicit here to avoid brittle assumptions.

Apply this diff to bring the initial state in line with the assertion:

         props.editors[0].instance.cascadePolicy.cascadePolicyType = 'ai_extract';
         props.editors[0].instance.cascadePolicy.id = null;
+        // Ensure the switch starts unchecked to match the expectations below
+        props.editors[0].instance.cascadePolicy.isEnabled = false;
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/MetadataInstanceEditor.test.js (2)

547-569: Adopt userEvent.setup() for reliability with async interactions

The recommended pattern is to use a per-test user instance via userEvent.setup(). It eliminates subtle async timing issues and aligns with the latest testing-library guidance.

Apply this diff:

-        const editButton = await screen.findByRole('button', { name: 'Edit Metadata' }, { timeout: 3000 });
-        await userEvent.click(editButton);
+        const user = userEvent.setup();
+        const editButton = await screen.findByRole('button', { name: 'Edit Metadata' }, { timeout: 3000 });
+        await user.click(editButton);
@@
-        await userEvent.click(cascadeToggle);
+        await user.click(cascadeToggle);
@@
-        await userEvent.click(comboBox);
+        await user.click(comboBox);
@@
-        await userEvent.click(enhancedOption);
+        await user.click(enhancedOption);

557-573: Reduce brittleness of combobox and option role/name queries

  • Not all custom Selects expose role="combobox"; some use role="button" + role="listbox"/"option" or menu roles.
  • Using the selected value ("Standard"/"Enhanced") as the accessible name of the combobox is implementation-specific and can break with a11y changes.

Consider a more resilient approach:

  • Query the combobox without relying on its accessible name, then assert the displayed value.
  • Or open the popup and query within the listbox for the option.

Example adjustments:

-        const comboBox = screen.getByRole('combobox', { name: 'Standard' });
+        // Prefer a broader role query, then assert displayed value separately
+        const comboBox = screen.getByRole('combobox');
+        expect(comboBox).toHaveAccessibleName(/standard/i);
@@
-        const enhancedOption = await screen.findByRole('option', { name: 'Enhanced' });
+        // If the implementation uses listbox/option roles, this will be stable
+        const enhancedOption = await screen.findByRole('option', { name: /enhanced/i });
@@
-        expect(screen.getByRole('combobox', { name: 'Enhanced' })).toBeInTheDocument();
+        // After selection, the combobox should reflect the new value
+        expect(comboBox).toHaveAccessibleName(/enhanced/i);

If the underlying control uses a button+menu pattern, swap 'combobox'/'option' for 'button' and 'menuitemradio' or assert by visible text inside the control.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these settings in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e7c3db and 36f9e21.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/__snapshots__/Instances.test.js.snap is excluded by !**/*.snap
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/Instances.test.js (0 hunks)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/MetadataInstanceEditor.test.js (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/tests/Instances.test.js
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: ahorowitz123
PR: box/box-ui-elements#4102
File: src/features/metadata-instance-editor/Instance.js:647-649
Timestamp: 2025-05-14T17:46:25.370Z
Learning: In the metadata-instance-editor component, `isExistingAIExtractionCascadePolicy` specifically checks if the cascade policy fetched from the backend has AI folder extraction enabled, using props rather than state to reflect the original server-side configuration rather than current UI state.
📚 Learning: 2025-05-14T17:46:25.370Z
Learnt from: ahorowitz123
PR: box/box-ui-elements#4102
File: src/features/metadata-instance-editor/Instance.js:647-649
Timestamp: 2025-05-14T17:46:25.370Z
Learning: In the metadata-instance-editor component, `isExistingAIExtractionCascadePolicy` specifically checks if the cascade policy fetched from the backend has AI folder extraction enabled, using props rather than state to reflect the original server-side configuration rather than current UI state.

Applied to files:

  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/MetadataInstanceEditor.test.js
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: lint_test_build
  • GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/MetadataInstanceEditor.test.js (2)

537-574: Good end-to-end coverage of the new agent selector flow

The test exercises the new flow (enable cascade, open the selector, choose "Enhanced") and validates the visible state transition. This is the right place to assert the UI contract post-removal of canUseAIFolderExtractionAgentSelector.


551-555: Verify control role: some Toggle implementations expose role="checkbox", not "switch"

If the underlying Toggle uses a checkbox pattern, getByRole('switch', ...) will fail. Consider ensuring the component exposes role="switch", or switch to a resilient query that supports both.

If needed, adjust with a fallback:

-        const cascadeToggle = screen.getByRole('switch', { name: 'Enable Cascade Policy' });
+        const cascadeToggle =
+            screen.queryByRole('switch', { name: 'Enable Cascade Policy' }) ||
+            screen.getByRole('checkbox', { name: 'Enable Cascade Policy' });

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)

298-298: Raising peerDependency to ^0.53.0 is reasonable; call out the peer bump in release notes to aid consumers.
Given 0.x semver, caret allows 0.53.x only, which is appropriate. This may require consumers to upgrade; a brief note in the changelog/migration guide will reduce friction.

Would you like me to draft a short release note entry summarizing:

  • peerDependencies: @box/box-ai-agent-selector ^0.52.0 → ^0.53.0
  • UI change: agent selector left-aligned and legacy gating prop removed?
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f09b521 and 791027d.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/__snapshots__/Instance.test.js.snap is excluded by !**/*.snap
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/__snapshots__/Instances.test.js.snap is excluded by !**/*.snap
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/__snapshots__/MetadataInstanceEditor.test.js.snap is excluded by !**/*.snap
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/CascadePolicy.js (1 hunks)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/Instance.js (0 hunks)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/Instances.js (0 hunks)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/MetadataInstanceEditor.js (0 hunks)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/CascadePolicy.test.js (0 hunks)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/Instance.test.js (0 hunks)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/Instances.test.js (3 hunks)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/__tests__/MetadataInstanceEditor.test.js (1 hunks)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/stories/tests/CascadePolicy-visual.stories.js (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (6)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/stories/tests/CascadePolicy-visual.stories.js
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/MetadataInstanceEditor.js
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/tests/Instance.test.js
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/tests/CascadePolicy.test.js
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/Instance.js
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/Instances.js
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/tests/Instances.test.js
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/CascadePolicy.js
  • src/features/metadata-instance-editor/tests/MetadataInstanceEditor.test.js
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: ahorowitz123
PR: box/box-ui-elements#4102
File: src/features/metadata-instance-editor/Instance.js:647-649
Timestamp: 2025-05-14T17:46:25.370Z
Learning: In the metadata-instance-editor component, `isExistingAIExtractionCascadePolicy` specifically checks if the cascade policy fetched from the backend has AI folder extraction enabled, using props rather than state to reflect the original server-side configuration rather than current UI state.
📚 Learning: 2025-08-12T18:04:17.698Z
Learnt from: tjuanitas
PR: box/box-ui-elements#4224
File: package.json:296-297
Timestamp: 2025-08-12T18:04:17.698Z
Learning: In the box-ui-elements project, the team is comfortable with raising peerDependency minimum versions when upgrading blueprint-web packages, even if it's a breaking change for consumers.

Applied to files:

  • package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Summary
  • GitHub Check: lint_test_build
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)

129-129: Dev/peer dependency bump confirmed; gating prop removal verified

  • No references to canUseAIFolderExtractionAgentSelector remain.
  • devDependencies and peerDependencies for @box/box-ai-agent-selector are both set to ^0.53.0.
  • yarn.lock resolves @box/[email protected].
  • No explicit selectorAlignment="left" occurrences found—please confirm that the component’s default aligns left or add the prop where it’s rendered.

@jlandisBox jlandisBox requested a review from tjuanitas August 18, 2025 19:32
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 1f953c0 into box:master Aug 18, 2025
8 checks passed
bfoxx1906 pushed a commit to bfoxx1906/box-ui-elements that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2025
box#4226)

* feat(metadata-instance-editor): remove ai agent selector split and fix styling

* fix: tests

* fix: tests

* feat: use new box ai agent selector with alignment
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2025
* feat(timestamped-comments): feature enabled timesetamp support

* feat(timestamped-comments): updating stories and adding toggle form

* feat(timestamped-comments): fixing flow errors

* feat(timestamped-comments): removing unnecessary prop

* feat(timestamped-comments): removing formatting

* feat(timestamped-comments): removing async modifier

* feat(timestamped-comments): removing unnecssary import

* feat(timestamped-comments): passing down file prop to BaseComment

* feat(metadata-instance-editor): remove ai agent selector split and fi… (#4226)

* feat(metadata-instance-editor): remove ai agent selector split and fix styling

* fix: tests

* fix: tests

* feat: use new box ai agent selector with alignment

* feat(metadata-view): Implement metadata sidepanel (#4230)

* feat(metadata-view): Implement metadata sidepanel

* feat(metadata-view): resolve comments

* feat(metadata-view): resolve comments

* feat(metadata-view): resolve nits

* feat(timestamped-comments): addressing PR feedback

* feat(timestamped-comments): addressing PR comments

* feat(timestamped-comments): addressing PR feedback

* feat(timestamped-comments): addressing PR feedback

* feat(timestamped-comments): fixing flow error

* feat(timestamped-comments): addressing PR feedback

* feat(timestamped-comments): fixing unit tests

---------

Co-authored-by: jlandisBox <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jerry Jiang <[email protected]>
greg-in-a-box pushed a commit to greg-in-a-box/box-ui-elements that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2025
…#4228)

* feat(timestamped-comments): feature enabled timesetamp support

* feat(timestamped-comments): updating stories and adding toggle form

* feat(timestamped-comments): fixing flow errors

* feat(timestamped-comments): removing unnecessary prop

* feat(timestamped-comments): removing formatting

* feat(timestamped-comments): removing async modifier

* feat(timestamped-comments): removing unnecssary import

* feat(timestamped-comments): passing down file prop to BaseComment

* feat(metadata-instance-editor): remove ai agent selector split and fi… (box#4226)

* feat(metadata-instance-editor): remove ai agent selector split and fix styling

* fix: tests

* fix: tests

* feat: use new box ai agent selector with alignment

* feat(metadata-view): Implement metadata sidepanel (box#4230)

* feat(metadata-view): Implement metadata sidepanel

* feat(metadata-view): resolve comments

* feat(metadata-view): resolve comments

* feat(metadata-view): resolve nits

* feat(timestamped-comments): addressing PR feedback

* feat(timestamped-comments): addressing PR comments

* feat(timestamped-comments): addressing PR feedback

* feat(timestamped-comments): addressing PR feedback

* feat(timestamped-comments): fixing flow error

* feat(timestamped-comments): addressing PR feedback

* feat(timestamped-comments): fixing unit tests

---------

Co-authored-by: jlandisBox <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jerry Jiang <[email protected]>
bfoxx1906 pushed a commit to bfoxx1906/box-ui-elements that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2025
box#4226)

* feat(metadata-instance-editor): remove ai agent selector split and fix styling

* fix: tests

* fix: tests

* feat: use new box ai agent selector with alignment
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants