Skip to content

[2021.1 compat] Use raw PairProcessor as parameter for PatternConditionPlus#processValues #2631

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 21, 2021
Merged

[2021.1 compat] Use raw PairProcessor as parameter for PatternConditionPlus#processValues #2631

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 4 additions & 1 deletion ...src/com/google/idea/blaze/java/lang/build/references/JavaClassQualifiedNameReference.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -46,13 +46,16 @@ public class JavaClassQualifiedNameReference
psiElement(Keyword.class)
.with(nameCondition(StandardPatterns.string().oneOf(JAVA_CLASS_STRING_TYPES))));

// #api203: remove "@SuppressWarnings({"rawtypes", "RedundantSuppression"})"
@SuppressWarnings({"rawtypes", "RedundantSuppression"})
private static PatternCondition<PsiElementBase> nameCondition(final ElementPattern<?> pattern) {
return new PatternConditionPlus<PsiElementBase, String>("_withPsiName", pattern) {
@Override
public boolean processValues(
PsiElementBase t,
ProcessingContext context,
PairProcessor<String, ProcessingContext> processor) {
// #api203 replace with "PairProcessor<? super String, ? super ProcessingContext>"
PairProcessor processor) {
return processor.process(t.getName(), context);
}
};
Expand Down