Skip to content

Conversation

@gregcorbett
Copy link
Member

Resolves #80

As there's no consistent way of handling optional packages across packaging systems, python-daemon should just be left out.

@gregcorbett gregcorbett requested a review from a team as a code owner August 13, 2021 14:57
@tofu-rocketry tofu-rocketry self-assigned this Aug 13, 2021
@tofu-rocketry tofu-rocketry added this to the 3.3.0 milestone Aug 13, 2021
@tofu-rocketry
Copy link
Member

That's the rebase done.

As there's no consistent way of handling optional dependencies across
packaging systems, python-daemon should just be left out as a hard
requirement.
As python-daemon is an optional requirement, we handle the case where it
is not installed but it's reuqired by supsequent code (when receiving).
Copy link
Contributor

@jounaidr jounaidr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tofu-rocketry tofu-rocketry merged commit db3dace into apel:dev Aug 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

python-daemon should not be listed as a requirement as it is not a hard requirement.

3 participants