Method descriptions for getters rely on implementation details

[elharo]

Affected version

3.11

Bug description

javadoc:fix goals produces method descriptions that look like this:

* <p>Getter for the field <code>project</code>.</p>

This is unhelpful and arguably bad. The field is an implementation detail that can change and shouldn't be exposed to clients. I'm int sure there is anything meaningful we can deduce without an LLM, but it certainly shouldn't be a field name. Just maybe we could say a property based on the getter name.

Should likely also drop the p tags here too.