Skip to content

branch-3.0: [Fix](cast) Fix lost of cast for nested type with precision (#54824) #55973

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: branch-3.0
Choose a base branch
from
Open

branch-3.0: [Fix](cast) Fix lost of cast for nested type with precision (#54824) #55973

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+186 −2

Conversation

zclllyybb
Copy link
Contributor

pick #54824

@zclllyybb
[Fix](cast) Fix lost of cast for nested type with precision (apache#5…
3332d87 
…4824)

before, we wrongly thought types like `array<datetime(x)>` and
`array<datetime(y)>` is same. it's wrong. it would lead to missing of
cast when translate CastExpr to thrift.
@Thearas
Copy link
Contributor

Thearas commented Sep 12, 2025

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@zclllyybb
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@dataroaring dataroaring Awaiting requested review from dataroaring dataroaring is a code owner

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@zclllyybb @Thearas