Skip to content

Conversation

@wesm
Copy link
Member

@wesm wesm commented Sep 5, 2019

also fixes ARROW-6434

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Moved code. Unchanged

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Moved code

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Relevant changes

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Relevant changes

@wesm
Copy link
Member Author

wesm commented Sep 6, 2019

There's another failure here, that separately came up in #5299. I'll add some tests and close #5299

@wesm
Copy link
Member Author

wesm commented Sep 6, 2019

OK, the Dask integration tests are passing again. Checking HDFS

@wesm
Copy link
Member Author

wesm commented Sep 6, 2019

OK, HDFS docker-compose job passing also now

@kszucs
Copy link
Member

kszucs commented Sep 6, 2019

@ursabot crossbow test docker-hdfs-integration docker-dask-integration

@ursabot
Copy link

ursabot commented Sep 6, 2019

AMD64 Conda Crossbow (#59368) builder has been succeeded.

Revision: 68b84439a483e1bd31eb6fc339ef9afe82c73d8c

Submitted crossbow builds: ursa-labs/crossbow @ ursabot-150

Task Status
docker-dask-integration CircleCI
docker-hdfs-integration CircleCI

@kszucs
Copy link
Member

kszucs commented Sep 6, 2019

@ursabot crossbow test docker-hdfs-integration

@ursabot
Copy link

ursabot commented Sep 6, 2019

AMD64 Conda Crossbow (#59373) builder has been succeeded.

Revision: 68b84439a483e1bd31eb6fc339ef9afe82c73d8c

Submitted crossbow builds: ursa-labs/crossbow @ ursabot-155

Task Status
docker-hdfs-integration CircleCI

@kszucs
Copy link
Member

kszucs commented Sep 6, 2019

The HDFS build was cancelled, don't know why.

@wesm
Copy link
Member Author

wesm commented Sep 6, 2019

Rebased this and fixed the conflict from #5299 (which should not have been merged)

@wesm
Copy link
Member Author

wesm commented Sep 6, 2019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants