-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
GH-47713: [C++][FlightRPC] ODBC return number of affected rows #48037
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
4fcdc67 to
2120315
Compare
|
@lidavidm this draft PR is ready for review! Please have a look |
2120315 to
67db4e7
Compare
| CheckStringColumnW(this->stmt, 2, L"One"); | ||
| CheckIntColumn(this->stmt, 3, 3); | ||
|
|
||
| ASSERT_EQ(SQL_SUCCESS, SQLRowCount(this->stmt, 0)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit, but can we write nullptr for nullptr and not use 0?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yup, fixed
67db4e7 to
b22c359
Compare
Update doc Co-Authored-By: alinalibq <[email protected]>
b22c359 to
aed5b0e
Compare
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 3 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 082377a. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 5 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
Rationale for this change
Make ODBC return number of affected rows as -1 which to BI tools means number of affected rows is unknown. This is because ODBC only supports
selectstatement and doesn't support queries that affect rows.What changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
Tested locally on MSVC
Are there any user-facing changes?
N/A