Skip to content

Conversation

@raulcd
Copy link
Member

@raulcd raulcd commented Oct 14, 2025

Rationale for this change

Our verify-rc-source Windows job is failing due to patch not being available for Windows.

What changes are included in this PR?

Move patch requirement from conda_env_cpp.txt to conda_env_unix.txt

Are these changes tested?

Yes via CI and archery.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

@github-actions
Copy link

⚠️ GitHub issue #47809 has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review label Oct 14, 2025
@github-actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

@raulcd
Copy link
Member Author

raulcd commented Oct 14, 2025

@github-actions crossbow submit conda verify-rc-source-*

@github-actions
Copy link

Revision: 71579cc

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-e9d2219c05

Task Status
example-python-minimal-build-fedora-conda GitHub Actions
test-conda-cpp GitHub Actions
test-conda-cpp-valgrind GitHub Actions
test-conda-python-3.10 GitHub Actions
test-conda-python-3.10-hdfs-2.9.2 GitHub Actions
test-conda-python-3.10-hdfs-3.2.1 GitHub Actions
test-conda-python-3.10-pandas-1.3.4-numpy-1.21.2 GitHub Actions
test-conda-python-3.11 GitHub Actions
test-conda-python-3.11-dask-latest GitHub Actions
test-conda-python-3.11-dask-upstream_devel GitHub Actions
test-conda-python-3.11-hypothesis GitHub Actions
test-conda-python-3.11-pandas-latest-numpy-latest GitHub Actions
test-conda-python-3.11-spark-master GitHub Actions
test-conda-python-3.12 GitHub Actions
test-conda-python-3.12-cpython-debug GitHub Actions
test-conda-python-3.12-pandas-latest-numpy-1.26 GitHub Actions
test-conda-python-3.12-pandas-latest-numpy-latest GitHub Actions
test-conda-python-3.13 GitHub Actions
test-conda-python-3.13-pandas-nightly-numpy-nightly GitHub Actions
test-conda-python-3.13-pandas-upstream_devel-numpy-nightly GitHub Actions
test-conda-python-3.14 GitHub Actions
test-conda-python-emscripten GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-cpp-linux-almalinux-8-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-cpp-linux-conda-latest-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-cpp-linux-ubuntu-22.04-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-cpp-linux-ubuntu-24.04-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-cpp-macos-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-cpp-macos-arm64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-cpp-macos-conda-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-integration-linux-almalinux-8-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-integration-linux-conda-latest-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-integration-linux-ubuntu-22.04-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-integration-linux-ubuntu-24.04-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-integration-macos-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-integration-macos-arm64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-integration-macos-conda-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-python-linux-almalinux-8-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-python-linux-conda-latest-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-python-linux-ubuntu-22.04-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-python-linux-ubuntu-24.04-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-python-macos-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-python-macos-arm64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-python-macos-conda-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-ruby-linux-almalinux-8-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-ruby-linux-conda-latest-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-ruby-linux-ubuntu-22.04-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-ruby-linux-ubuntu-24.04-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-ruby-macos-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-ruby-macos-arm64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-windows GitHub Actions

@raulcd raulcd marked this pull request as ready for review October 14, 2025 10:33
@raulcd
Copy link
Member Author

raulcd commented Oct 14, 2025

None of the CI failures are related, they are already happening on our nightlies on main (not happening on the maintenance branch).

@raulcd raulcd requested a review from pitrou October 14, 2025 11:07
Copy link
Member

@pitrou pitrou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, thank you. I am surprised that conda-forge does not package patch for Windows. @h-vetinari Is that expected?

@raulcd raulcd merged commit 2a5ad38 into apache:main Oct 14, 2025
38 of 40 checks passed
@raulcd raulcd removed the awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review label Oct 14, 2025
raulcd added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2025
…l patch from conda (#47810)

### Rationale for this change

Our verify-rc-source Windows job is failing due to patch not being available for Windows.

### What changes are included in this PR?

Move patch requirement from `conda_env_cpp.txt` to `conda_env_unix.txt`

### Are these changes tested?

Yes via CI and archery.

### Are there any user-facing changes?

No

* GitHub Issue: #47809

Authored-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
@raulcd raulcd deleted the GH-47809 branch October 14, 2025 12:44
@h-vetinari
Copy link
Contributor

I am surprised that conda-forge does not package patch for Windows. @h-vetinari Is that expected?

There's no native patch, but a repackaged m2sys binary, which is available as m2-patch

@conbench-apache-arrow
Copy link

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 3 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 2a5ad38.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 5 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

zanmato1984 pushed a commit to zanmato1984/arrow that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2025
…install patch from conda (apache#47810)

### Rationale for this change

Our verify-rc-source Windows job is failing due to patch not being available for Windows.

### What changes are included in this PR?

Move patch requirement from `conda_env_cpp.txt` to `conda_env_unix.txt`

### Are these changes tested?

Yes via CI and archery.

### Are there any user-facing changes?

No

* GitHub Issue: apache#47809

Authored-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants