-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
GH-43502: [Java] Fix Java JNI / AMD64 manylinux2014 Java JNI test not test dataset module #43503
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@github-actions crossbow submit -g java |
|
|
|
Revision: a39435082b2b676c76fae1e348192ea1965886a5 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-a30ce59033 |
|
And it still has a problem , https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/main/ci/docker/java-jni-manylinux-201x.dockerfile#L53, |
I didn't get it clearly, could you please elaborate a bit? |
|
It check the |
Let me check, though if this is true, we have had the CIs running without any of these checks 🤔 |
|
@jinchengchenghh on top of that there is already a CI failure for dataset. |
I think you are right, not sure where to set the environment, but the test really triggers. I will try to fix the exception, my IDE sync cause some problems |
|
Can you mark it as ignore? I will draft a new PR to solve it. |
I will take a look at that.
Thanks, that would be wonderful, but I am not sure if this is related to the recent PRs (didn't check yet). |
would you like to push the patch to this branch? |
|
Btw, does that failing test in the CI work locally? |
|
Do you know how to push to this branch? I don't think I have write access to |
|
#41646 skip tests |
I will add the rights. |
|
@jinchengchenghh I have added you and you should have commit rights, please check. |
|
ok thanks! I will draft a PR as soon as possible |
|
I investigate the question again, the exception should not occur, looks like the linked library is not right. Can anyone help to check it? |
let me check this locally. |
|
@github-actions crossbow submit java-jars |
|
@github-actions crossbow submit -g java |
|
Revision: cb36191 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-92c9a56dee |
|
@github-actions crossbow submit java-jars |
|
Revision: cb36191 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-67f1c3bfef
|
|
@danepitkin shall we re-run the java-jars? I am not sure what that failure is. |
|
Hmm. self-hosted arm64 Linux runner may have a problem: arrow/dev/tasks/java-jars/github.yml Line 43 in 2e1b245
Disk size? |
|
@kou honestly not sure... |
|
I think the previous java-jars successful run proves its fine. However the Java JNI CI job is failing. Did we want to fix the TestCsvFragment options in this PR? |
Wasn't the objective in this PR though. |
|
@github-actions crossbow submit java-jars |
|
Revision: cb36191 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-f25c638877
|
danepitkin
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Gandiva builds, java-jars now failing on #43506
|
Thanks @danepitkin |
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit cdfdfb8. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 3 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
…st not test dataset module (apache#43503) ### Rationale for this change JNI tests had a typo in the script where we have included `gandiva` instead of `dataset`. ### What changes are included in this PR? This PR fixes that typo in the current version. ### Are these changes tested? Yes, by existing tests and CIs. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No * GitHub Issue: apache#43502 Authored-by: Vibhatha Abeykoon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dane Pitkin <[email protected]>
Rationale for this change
JNI tests had a typo in the script where we have included
gandivainstead ofdataset.What changes are included in this PR?
This PR fixes that typo in the current version.
Are these changes tested?
Yes, by existing tests and CIs.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No