Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
33 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
75c7890
first draft
paleolimbot Nov 18, 2022
f9aff01
some clarifications
paleolimbot Nov 22, 2022
cd73564
update the R section of the release guide
paleolimbot Nov 22, 2022
62d4a33
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Nov 22, 2022
9386274
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Nov 22, 2022
8ae4993
apply review suggestions
paleolimbot Nov 22, 2022
14f7af2
copy wiki content
paleolimbot Nov 22, 2022
a58be68
updates
paleolimbot Nov 29, 2022
6c23b74
ignore badges
paleolimbot Nov 29, 2022
62a65f0
a few more updates
paleolimbot Nov 29, 2022
a2a4ac1
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Nov 29, 2022
f982caa
qualify the tweet thread bullet
paleolimbot Nov 29, 2022
d302439
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Nov 29, 2022
5e4fd7a
fix url
paleolimbot Nov 29, 2022
282e78b
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Nov 29, 2022
780ec18
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Nov 30, 2022
ab41e71
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Nov 30, 2022
dca9b36
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Nov 30, 2022
36bd3e5
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Nov 30, 2022
97b350e
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Nov 30, 2022
afe23c2
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Nov 30, 2022
567ee14
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Nov 30, 2022
4e9c0b3
edits for Neal's review
paleolimbot Nov 30, 2022
ce003a9
Update packageing
paleolimbot Nov 30, 2022
148b471
clarify the `make build` step
paleolimbot Dec 1, 2022
9cce455
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Dec 1, 2022
d2edb6e
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Dec 1, 2022
528541f
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Dec 1, 2022
1b9b843
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Dec 1, 2022
1ec8b91
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Dec 1, 2022
3f8d2b5
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Dec 1, 2022
a981190
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Dec 1, 2022
6fd9d40
Update r/PACKAGING.md
paleolimbot Dec 8, 2022
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
34 changes: 33 additions & 1 deletion docs/source/developers/release.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -487,7 +487,39 @@ Be sure to go through on the following checklist:
:class-title: sd-fs-5
:class-container: sd-shadow-md

TODO: Move from https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Release+Management+Guide#ReleaseManagementGuide-UpdatingRpackages
To publish the R package on CRAN, there are a few steps we need to do first
in order to ensure that binaries for Windows and macOS are available to CRAN.
Jeroen Ooms <[email protected]> maintains several projects that build C++
dependencies for R packages for macOS and Windows. We test copies of these
same build scripts in our CI, and at release time, we need to send any
changes we have and update the versions/hashes upstream.

When the release candidate is made, make draft pull requests to each
repository using the rc, updating the version and SHA, as well as any cmake
build changes from the corresponding files in apache/arrow. Jeroen may
merge these PRs before the release vote passes, build the binary artifacts,
and publish them in the right places so that we can do pre-submission checks
(see below). After the release candidate vote passes, update these PRs
to point to the official (non-rc) URL and mark them as ready for review.
Comment on lines +502 to +503
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where would I find this official URL?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think they are embedded in the hombrew files (there are links to the homebrew scripts in the checklist). I think there will be a number of specific additions after we get through this release and I wonder if we could use the release issue itself as a place to collect additions that would be useful?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Each of these scripts has the official and rc URLs in them, and it's a matter of updating the versions and (un)commenting to enable one or the other.

Jeroen will merge, build the binary artifacts, and publish them in the
right places. See the
`packaging checklist <https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/r/PACKAGING.md>`_.
for a precise list of pull requests that must be made prior to submission
to CRAN.

Once these binary prerequisites have been satisfied, we can submit to CRAN.
Given the vagaries of the process, it is best if the R developers on the
project verify the CRAN-worthiness of the package before submitting.
Our CI systems give us some coverage for the things that CRAN checks, but
there are a couple of final tests we should do to confirm that the release
binaries will work and that everything runs on the same infrastructure that
CRAN has, which is difficult/impossible to emulate fully on Travis or with
Docker. For a precise list of checks, see the
`packaging checklist <https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/r/PACKAGING.md>`_.

Once all checks are clean, we submit to CRAN, which has a web form for
uploading packages. The release process requires email confirmation
from the R package maintainer, currently Neal Richardson.

.. dropdown:: Update vcpkg port
:animate: fade-in-slide-down
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions r/.Rbuildignore
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -30,3 +30,4 @@ STYLE.md
^cheatsheet$
^revdep$
^vignettes$
^PACKAGING\.md$
136 changes: 136 additions & 0 deletions r/PACKAGING.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@

<!---
Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
distributed with this work for additional information
regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
"License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at

http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
software distributed under the License is distributed on an
"AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
specific language governing permissions and limitations
under the License.
-->

# Packaging checklist for CRAN release

For a high-level overview of the release process see the
[Apache Arrow Release Management Guide](https://arrow.apache.org/docs/developers/release.html#post-release-tasks).

Before the release candidate is cut:

- [ ] [Create a GitHub issue](https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/new/)
entitled `[R] CRAN packaging checklist for version X.X.X`
and copy this checklist to the issue.
- [ ] Evaluate the status of any failing
[nightly tests and nightly packaging builds](http://crossbow.voltrondata.com). These checks
replicate most of the checks that CRAN runs, so we need them all to be passing
or to understand that the failures may (though won't necessarily) result in a rejection from CRAN.
- [ ] Check [current CRAN check results](https://cran.rstudio.org/web/checks/check_results_arrow.html)
- [ ] Ensure the contents of the README are accurate and up to date
- [ ] Run `urlchecker::url_check()` on the R directory at the release candidate
commit. Ignore any errors with badges as they will be removed in the CRAN release branch.
- [ ] [Polish NEWS](https://style.tidyverse.org/news.html#news-release) but do **not** update version numbers (this is done automatically later).
- [ ] For major releases, prepare tweet thread highlighting new features

Wait for the release candidate to be cut:

- [ ] Release candidate!
- [ ] Create a CRAN-release branch from the release candidate commit

Make pull requests into the [autobrew](https://github.com/autobrew) and
[rtools-packages](https://github.com/r-windows/rtools-packages) repositories
used by the configure script on MacOS and Windows. These pull requests will
use the release candidate as the source.

- [ ] Pull request to modify
[the apache-arrow autobrew formula]( https://github.com/autobrew/homebrew-core/blob/high-sierra/Formula/apache-arrow.rb)
to update the release version, SHA256 checksum of the release source file (which can be found in the same directory as the release source file), and any changes to dependencies and build steps that have changed in the
[copy of the formula we have of that formula in the Arrow repo](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/dev/tasks/homebrew-formulae/autobrew/apache-arrow.rb)
- [ ] Pull request to modify
[the apache-arrow-static autobrew formula]( https://github.com/autobrew/homebrew-core/blob/master/Formula/apache-arrow-static.rb)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I get a 404 for this URL

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
[the apache-arrow-static autobrew formula]( https://github.com/autobrew/homebrew-core/blob/master/Formula/apache-arrow-static.rb)
[the apache-arrow-static autobrew formula]( https://github.com/autobrew/homebrew-cran/blob/master/Formula/apache-arrow-static.rb)

to update the version, SHA, and any changes to dependencies and build steps that have changed in the
[copy of the formula we have of that formula in the Arrow repo](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/dev/tasks/homebrew-formulae/autobrew/apache-arrow-static.rb)
- [ ] Pull request to modify the
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be good to note that there often are no changes in this script, and that's ok.

[autobrew script](https://github.com/autobrew/scripts/blob/master/apache-arrow)
to include any additions made to
[r/tools/autobrew](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/r/tools/autobrew).
- [ ] Pull request to modify the
[RTools PKGBUILD script](https://github.com/r-windows/rtools-packages/blob/master/mingw-w64-arrow/PKGBUILD)
to reflect changes in
[ci/PKGBUILD](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/ci/scripts/PKGBUILD),
uncommenting the line that says "uncomment to test the rc".

Prepare and check the .tar.gz that will be released to CRAN.

- [ ] `git fetch upstream && git checkout release-X.X.X-rcXX && git clean -f -d`
- [ ] Run `make build`. This copies Arrow C++ into tools/cpp, prunes some
unnecessary components, and runs `R CMD build` to generate the source tarball.
Because this will install the package, you will need to ensure that the version
of Arrow C++ available to the configure script is the same as the version
that is vendored into the R package (e.g., you may need to unset `ARROW_HOME`).
- [ ] `devtools::check_built("arrow_X.X.X.tar.gz")` locally
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you're doing make build already, you might as well just collapse these two steps by saying "Run make release"

- [ ] Run reverse dependency checks. Currently this is a
[manual process](https://gist.github.com/paleolimbot/630fdab1e204d70fea97633d8fa15ccb);
however, in the future it may be a crossbow nightly job.

Wait for the official release...

- [ ] Release vote passed!
- [ ] If the release candidate commit updated, rebase the CRAN release branch
on that commit.
- [ ] Pick any commits that were made to master since the release commit that
were needed to fix CRAN-related submission issues identified in the above
steps.
- [ ] Remove badges from README.md
- [ ] Run `urlchecker::url_check()` on the R directory
- [ ] Create a PR entitled `WIP: [R] Verify CRAN release-10.0.1-rc0`. Add
a comment `@github-actions crossbow submit --group r` to run all R crossbow
jobs against the CRAN-specific release branch.
Comment on lines +93 to +95
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is great, much more clear, thanks!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, wait, what branches are we comparing on the PR? Does it even matter? I made an arbitrary one which branched off the release candidate and made a whitespace change. Should we recommend that here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For crossbow I think we just need any PR to exist as long as "from" is correct. I think a whitespace change is fine for now but we should find a workflow that is less of a hack in the future. I don't have a good answer right now though!

- [ ] Regenerate arrow_X.X.X.tar.gz (i.e., `make build`)

Create new autobrew and r-windows PRs such that they use the *release*
instead of the *release candidate*; ensure linux binary packages are available:

- [ ] PR into autobrew/homebrew-core (apache-arrow autobrew formula)
- [ ] PR into autobrew/homebrew-core (apache-arrow-static autobrew formula)
- [ ] PR into autobrew/scripts
- [ ] PR into r-windows/rtools-packages
- [ ] Ensure linux binaries are available in the artifactory:
https://apache.jfrog.io/ui/repos/tree/General/arrow/r

Check binary Arrow C++ distributions specific to the R package:

- [ ] Upload the .tar.gz to [win-builder](https://win-builder.r-project.org/upload.aspx) (r-devel only)
and confirm (with Neal, who will automatically receive an email about the results) that the check is clean.
This step cannot be completed before Jeroen has put the binaries in the MinGW repository, i.e. [here](https://ftp.opencpu.org/rtools/ucrt64/), [here](https://ftp.opencpu.org/rtools/mingw64/), and [here](https://ftp.opencpu.org/rtools/mingw32/).
- [ ] Upload the .tar.gz to [MacBuilder](https://mac.r-project.org/macbuilder/submit.html)
and confirm that the check is clean
- [ ] Check `install.packages("arrow_X.X.X.tar.gz")` on Ubuntu and ensure that the
hosted binaries are used
- [ ] `devtools::check_built("arrow_X.X.X.tar.gz")` locally one more time (for luck)

Submit!

- [ ] Upload arrow_X.X.X.tar.gz to the
[CRAN submit page](https://xmpalantir.wu.ac.at/cransubmit/)
- [ ] Confirm the submission email

Wait for CRAN...

- [ ] Accepted!
- [ ] Tag the tip of the CRAN-specific release branch
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tag how? This isn't something we've done before

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suppose we don't have to (as long as there is a way to get back to the source at the time of the CRAN release in case we need to patch something?)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, I've created a branch on my fork called r-10.0.1, but we should probably do something more robust.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@paleolimbot Any thoughts on this?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think for now that is OK. For 11.0.0, perhaps we can file an issue or ask on the mailing list what the appropriate branch name would be in the main Arrow repo? There is not currently any equivalent branch on the main repo for the packaging of a component but I imagine this has come up before (patches applied prior to packaging a component).

- [ ] Add a new line to the matrix in the [backwards compatability job](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/dev/tasks/r/github.linux.arrow.version.back.compat.yml)
- [ ] (patch releases only) Update the package version in `ci/scripts/PKGBUILD`, `dev/tasks/homebrew-formulae/autobrew/apache-arrow.rb`, `r/DESCRIPTION`, and `r/NEWS.md`
- [ ] Update the packaging checklist template to reflect any new realities of the
packaging process.
- [ ] Wait for CRAN-hosted binaries on the
[CRAN package page](https://cran.r-project.org/package=arrow) to reflect the
new version
- [ ] Tweet!